Han Jingya, Zhang Yajun, Ji Mengzhen, Sun Jingfei, Jia Shuhan, Wang Zhifeng
Dept. of Paediatric Dentistry, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University & Shandong Key Laboratory of Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Engineering Research Center of Dental Materials and Oral Tissue Regeneration & Shandong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Jinan 250012, China.
Dept. of Stomatology, Yancheng No.1 People's Hospital, Yancheng 224000, China.
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 1;43(3):383-394. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2025.2024418.
To assess the effectiveness of the comparison between pit and fissure sealants and fluoride varnishes, as well as various types of sealants, in preventing caries on the occlusal surface of children's first permanent molars (FPM).
Conduct a comprehensive search of literature published between January 1, 1988, and May 30, 2024, in the following databases: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, China Science Periodical Database and China Biology Medicine database. Meta-analysis and subgroup analyses were performed on the literature that met the inclusion criteria.
A total of 5 618 pieces of literature were retrieved, resulting in the inclusion of 14 in the study. Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the efficacy between varies pit and fissure sealants compared to fluoride varnishes, and between varies types of sealants in preventing caries on the occlusal surface of children's first permanent molars within 24 months post-surgery (>0.05).
Within 24 months, there was no significant difference in the effectiveness of using resin-based or glass iomomer pit and fissure sealants compared with fluoride varnishes in preventing occlusal caries in FPM in children; within 24 months, there was no significant difference in the effectiveness of using resin-based sealants compared with ART sealants in preventing occlusal caries in FPM in children. ART sealants are recommended over resin-based sealers for children who have no conditions for chair-side manipulation or who are poorly co-operative.
评估窝沟封闭剂与氟漆以及不同类型的封闭剂在预防儿童第一恒磨牙(FPM)咬合面龋齿方面的比较效果。
全面检索1988年1月1日至2024年5月30日期间发表在以下数据库中的文献:中国知网、科学引文索引、考克兰图书馆、荷兰医学文摘数据库、医学期刊数据库、中国科学期刊数据库和中国生物医学数据库。对符合纳入标准的文献进行荟萃分析和亚组分析。
共检索到5618篇文献,最终纳入14篇进行研究。荟萃分析表明,在术后24个月内,与氟漆相比,不同类型的窝沟封闭剂在预防儿童第一恒磨牙咬合面龋齿方面的疗效无统计学显著差异(P>0.05),不同类型的封闭剂之间也无显著差异。
在24个月内,使用树脂基或玻璃离子窝沟封闭剂与氟漆在预防儿童第一恒磨牙咬合面龋齿方面的效果无显著差异;在24个月内,使用树脂基封闭剂与非创伤性修复治疗(ART)封闭剂在预防儿童第一恒磨牙咬合面龋齿方面的效果无显著差异。对于无条件进行椅旁操作或合作性差的儿童,推荐使用ART封闭剂而非树脂基封闭剂。