• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典父母视角下的儿科重症监护病房护理满意度评估

Evaluation of Satisfaction With Care in Paediatric Intensive Care Units: Swedish Parents' Perspective.

作者信息

Terp Karina, Jakobsson Ulf, Weis Janne, Lundqvist Pia

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Center for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences (Malmö), Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Jul;30(4):e70086. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70086.

DOI:10.1111/nicc.70086
PMID:40524501
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A child's hospitalization in a paediatric intensive care unit is a stressful experience for parents. Measuring parental satisfaction may indicate how parents are affected by the experience. Satisfaction with care is closely connected to the overall quality of care.

AIM

The aim was to explore parental satisfaction with paediatric intensive care.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHOD

A cross-sectional study design was utilized at two PICUs in Sweden. Inclusion criteria were parents who spoke and understood Swedish and whose child was < 18 years old and hospitalized at the PICU for at least 48 h. Exclusion criteria were parents whose child died during the care period at the PICU. The questionnaire EMPATHIC-30, grounded in the principles of family-centred care, was the basis for the data collection. Descriptive statistics and a non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney U-test) were used to present the data.

RESULTS

A total of 234 questionnaires were distributed, and the response rate was 42.73%. Notably, 100 parents responded to the questionnaire, and 97 were included (mothers n = 50 and fathers n = 47). The parents' mean age was 36.26 years (SD 7.00) and ranged between 23 to 61 years. The results revealed high levels of parental satisfaction with the care provided according to total scale (5.53), domains (5.42-5.77), as well as single items (4.44-5.99). The EMPATHIC-30 scores indicated that parents felt well-informed about their child's condition and received emotional support from health care professionals. Additionally, the study identified areas for improvement, such as the need for enhanced communication, being actively involved in the process of decision-making as well as being involved/prepared before discharge from the PICU.

CONCLUSION

Parents expressed high satisfaction across the five domains and for the total scale. However, areas for improvement were identified for individual items. Factors that tended to give lower satisfaction were communication between health care professionals and parents, as well as parents' active involvement in decision-making regarding their child's care.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The results of this study emphasize the need for health care organizations to prioritize communication strategies for parents of children cared for at PICUs. By applying a person-centred two-way communication, health care professionals can facilitate open and transparent communication with parents, which can promote parental involvement in care and decision-making.

摘要

背景

孩子在儿科重症监护病房住院对父母来说是一段压力巨大的经历。衡量父母的满意度可以表明父母受这段经历影响的程度。对护理的满意度与护理的整体质量密切相关。

目的

本研究旨在探讨父母对儿科重症监护的满意度。

研究设计与方法

在瑞典的两个儿科重症监护病房采用横断面研究设计。纳入标准为能说并理解瑞典语、孩子年龄小于18岁且在儿科重症监护病房住院至少48小时的父母。排除标准为孩子在儿科重症监护病房护理期间死亡的父母。基于以家庭为中心的护理原则的问卷EMPATHIC - 30是数据收集的基础。采用描述性统计和非参数检验(曼 - 惠特尼U检验)来呈现数据。

结果

共发放234份问卷,回复率为42.73%。值得注意的是,100位父母回复了问卷,97位被纳入研究(母亲50位,父亲47位)。父母的平均年龄为36.26岁(标准差7.00),年龄范围在23至61岁之间。结果显示,根据总评分(5.53)、各领域评分(5.42 - 5.77)以及单个项目评分(4.44 - 5.99),父母对所提供护理的满意度较高。EMPATHIC - 30评分表明,父母对孩子的病情了解充分,并得到了医护人员的情感支持。此外,研究还确定了需要改进的方面,如需要加强沟通、积极参与决策过程以及在从儿科重症监护病房出院前做好准备。

结论

父母在五个领域和总评分方面都表达了较高的满意度。然而,个别项目仍有需要改进的地方。满意度较低的因素包括医护人员与父母之间的沟通以及父母对孩子护理决策的积极参与。

与临床实践的相关性

本研究结果强调医疗保健机构需要优先为在儿科重症监护病房接受护理的孩子的父母制定沟通策略。通过采用以人为本的双向沟通,医护人员可以促进与父母进行开放和透明的沟通,这可以促进父母参与护理和决策。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Satisfaction With Care in Paediatric Intensive Care Units: Swedish Parents' Perspective.瑞典父母视角下的儿科重症监护病房护理满意度评估
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Jul;30(4):e70086. doi: 10.1111/nicc.70086.
2
Parents' experiences of psychotherapeutic support on the neonatal unit: A mixed methods systematic review to inform intervention development for a multicultural population.父母在新生儿病房接受心理治疗支持的经历:一项混合方法的系统评价,为多元文化人群的干预发展提供信息。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e13194. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13194. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in hospitalized children.促进住院儿童睡眠的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 15;6(6):CD012908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012908.pub2.
4
Towards a patient-centred definition for atopic dermatitis flare: a qualitative study of adults with atopic dermatitis.迈向以患者为中心的特应性皮炎发作定义:一项特应性皮炎成人患者的定性研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jun 20;191(1):82-91. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae037.
5
What makes a 'good' decision with artificial intelligence? A grounded theory study in paediatric care.如何利用人工智能做出“好”的决策?一项关于儿科护理的扎根理论研究。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 May 20;30(3):183-193. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112919.
6
Aural toilet (ear cleaning) for chronic suppurative otitis media.慢性化脓性中耳炎的耳道清理(耳部清洁)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 9;6(6):CD013057. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013057.pub3.
7
Patient and Public Perceptions of 3D Technologies (Models and Images) to Facilitate Health Care Consultations: Exploratory, Mixed Methods Study.患者及公众对用于辅助医疗咨询的3D技术(模型和图像)的认知:探索性混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jun 18;9:e65235. doi: 10.2196/65235.
8
Pelvic floor muscle training with feedback or biofeedback for urinary incontinence in women.针对女性尿失禁的盆底肌训练及反馈或生物反馈训练
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 11;3(3):CD009252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009252.pub2.
9
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Preferences on Treatment Decision Making in Sarcoma Patients: Prevalence and Associated Factors - Results from the PROSa Study.肉瘤患者治疗决策的偏好:患病率及相关因素——PROSa研究结果
Oncol Res Treat. 2025;48(4):174-185. doi: 10.1159/000543456. Epub 2025 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The Development of a Communication Tool to Aid Parent-Centered Communication between Parents and Healthcare Professionals: A Quality Improvement Project.开发一种促进家长与医疗保健专业人员之间以家长为中心沟通的交流工具:一项质量改进项目。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 10;11(20):2706. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202706.
2
The Swedish version of EMPATHIC-30 translation and initial psychometric evaluation.EMPATHIC-30 瑞典语版翻译及初步心理计量学评估。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2023 Sep;37(3):805-811. doi: 10.1111/scs.13166. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
3
Stressful Experiences of Parents in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit: Searching for the Most Intensive PICU Stressors.
父母在儿科重症监护病房的压力体验:寻找最强烈的 PICU 压力源。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 12;19(18):11450. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811450.
4
The German EMPATHIC-30 Questionnaire Showed Reliability and Convergent Validity for Use in an Intermediary/General Pediatric Cardiology Unit: A Psychometric Evaluation.德国的EMPATHIC - 30问卷在中级/普通儿科心脏病科使用时显示出可靠性和收敛效度:一项心理测量学评估。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 23;9:901260. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.901260. eCollection 2022.
5
Parents' satisfaction with care in pediatric intensive care units.家长对儿科重症监护病房护理的满意度。
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2022 May 23;43:e20210003. doi: 10.1590/1983-1447.2022.20210003.en. eCollection 2022.
6
Acute and Posttraumatic Stress in Family Members of Children With a Prolonged Stay in a PICU: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.儿科重症监护病房(PICU)患儿家属的急性和创伤后应激:一项随机试验的二次分析。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;23(4):306-314. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002913. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
7
Sources of Stress, Family Functioning, and Needs of Families With a Chronic Critically Ill Child: A Qualitative Study.患有慢性危重症儿童家庭的压力源、家庭功能及需求:一项定性研究。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Nov 4;9:740598. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.740598. eCollection 2021.
8
Selected predictors of parental satisfaction with child nursing care in paediatric wards in Poland-Cross-sectional study.波兰儿科病房中父母对儿童护理满意度的选择预测因素——横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 19;16(11):e0260504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260504. eCollection 2021.
9
Parents' Views of Family-Centered Care at a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit-A Qualitative Study.父母对儿科重症监护病房以家庭为中心护理的看法——一项定性研究
Front Pediatr. 2021 Aug 25;9:725040. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.725040. eCollection 2021.
10
Differing needs of mothers and fathers during their child's end-of-life care: secondary analysis of the "Paediatric end-of-life care needs" (PELICAN) study.父母在孩子临终关怀期间的不同需求:“儿科临终关怀需求”(PELICAN)研究的二次分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Aug 4;19(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00621-1.