• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

字里行间的解读:心胸外科高质量推荐信的决定因素

Reading Between the Lines: Determinants of a High-Quality Letter of Recommendation in Cardiothoracic Surgery.

作者信息

Go Pauline H, Zulch Emma R, Zukowski Monica, Taylor Matthew D, Reed Michael F

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2024 Dec 26;3(2):543-548. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.12.006. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.atssr.2024.12.006
PMID:40525149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12167549/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The letter of recommendation is an important component of a residency application and is useful for identifying stellar cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) candidates. We identify letter attributes and phrases that CTS program directors (PDs) find to be the most valuable in selecting candidates.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed to CTS PDs in the United States and Canada, querying the importance of various letter characteristics. Reponses were ranked on the basis of a weighted average.

RESULTS

Twenty-six (26.5%) CTS PDs completed the survey. Personal acquaintanceship with the writer was the most important characteristic (weighted average, 4.77). Interpersonal skills, teamwork, and professionalism were the most important applicant attributes (4.00, 3.88, 3.76). Inclusion of personal interactions or experiences with the applicant (4.65) and the phrases "I give my highest recommendation" (4.56) and "we plan to recruit this candidate" (4.52) were rated the highest.

CONCLUSIONS

Describing personal interactions and experiences with the applicant, their work ethic, interpersonal skills, and teamwork is essential for a strong letter. Personal acquaintanceship with the letter writer has the greatest positive impact overall.

摘要

背景

推荐信是住院医师申请的重要组成部分,有助于识别优秀的心胸外科(CTS)候选人。我们确定了CTS项目主任(PDs)在选拔候选人时认为最有价值的推荐信属性和措辞。

方法

向美国和加拿大的CTS项目主任发放了一份在线调查问卷,询问各种推荐信特征的重要性。根据加权平均值对回答进行排名。

结果

26名(26.5%)CTS项目主任完成了调查。与写信人的个人交情是最重要的特征(加权平均值为4.77)。人际交往能力、团队合作精神和职业素养是最重要的申请人属性(分别为4.00、3.88、3.76)。包含与申请人的个人互动或经历(4.65)以及措辞“我给予最高推荐”(4.56)和“我们计划招募这名候选人”(4.52)的评价最高。

结论

描述与申请人的个人互动和经历、他们的职业道德、人际交往能力和团队合作精神对于一封有力的推荐信至关重要。与写信人的个人交情总体上具有最大的积极影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/12167549/bb79992313d2/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/12167549/7b52b72bc2dc/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/12167549/8da05b299566/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/12167549/234535d61f10/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/12167549/bb79992313d2/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/12167549/7b52b72bc2dc/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/12167549/8da05b299566/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/12167549/234535d61f10/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa9f/12167549/bb79992313d2/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Reading Between the Lines: Determinants of a High-Quality Letter of Recommendation in Cardiothoracic Surgery.字里行间的解读:心胸外科高质量推荐信的决定因素
Ann Thorac Surg Short Rep. 2024 Dec 26;3(2):543-548. doi: 10.1016/j.atssr.2024.12.006. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
What Are We REALLY Looking for in a Letter of Recommendation?我们在推荐信中真正要寻找的是什么?
J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov-Dec;76(6):e118-e124. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
3
The Role of Letters of Recommendation in the Selection Process of Surgical Residents in Canada: A National Survey of Program Directors.推荐信在加拿大外科住院医师选拔过程中的作用:对项目主任的全国性调查。
J Surg Educ. 2017 Jul-Aug;74(4):762-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
4
Cracking the code: interpreting content and phrases used in maternal-fetal medicine fellowship letters of recommendation.破解密码:解读母胎医学研究员推荐信中的内容和短语。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Aug;6(8):101404. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101404. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
5
Factors considered in ranking orthopedic shoulder and elbow fellowship applicants: a survey of program directors.骨科肩肘专科 fellowship 申请者排名时考虑的因素:项目主任的调查
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2021 Jan 1;1(2):151-154. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2020.12.001. eCollection 2021 May.
6
Factors Considered in Ranking Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Fellowship Applicants: A Survey of Program Directors.髋关节和膝关节置换专科医师培训项目申请人排名时考虑的因素:项目主任的调查
Arthroplast Today. 2020 Aug 4;6(3):623-627.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.05.001. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
How Prominent Are Gender Bias, Racial Bias, and Score Inflation in Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Recommendation Letters? A Systematic Review.在骨科住院医师推荐信中,性别偏见、种族偏见和评分膨胀有多明显?一项系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jun 1;482(6):916-928. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003062. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
8
Factors Considered in Ranking Orthopaedic Trauma Fellowship Applicants: A Survey of Program Directors.骨科创伤研究员申请人排名考虑因素:项目主任调查。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2020 Nov 17;4(11):e20.00180. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00180.
9
Letter of Recommendation Characteristics Associated with Interview Offer to a Vascular Surgery Residency Program.与血管外科住院医师培训项目面试邀请相关的推荐信特征
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;109:382-395. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.05.030. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
10
Diagnostic Radiology Fellowship Applicant Selection Criteria: A Survey of Program Directors.诊断放射学 fellowship 申请人选拔标准:项目主任的调查
Cureus. 2023 May 1;15(5):e38409. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38409. eCollection 2023 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Pediatric, Surgery, and Internal Medicine Program Director Interpretations of Letters of Recommendation.儿科、外科和内科项目主任对推荐信的解读。
Acad Med. 2019 Nov;94(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S64-S68. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002919.
2
What Are We REALLY Looking for in a Letter of Recommendation?我们在推荐信中真正要寻找的是什么?
J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov-Dec;76(6):e118-e124. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
3
The Role of Letters of Recommendation in the Selection Process of Surgical Residents in Canada: A National Survey of Program Directors.
推荐信在加拿大外科住院医师选拔过程中的作用:对项目主任的全国性调查。
J Surg Educ. 2017 Jul-Aug;74(4):762-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
4
Variability of Ratings in the Otolaryngology Standardized Letter of Recommendation.耳鼻喉科标准化推荐信评分的可变性。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Feb;154(2):287-93. doi: 10.1177/0194599815623525. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Evaluation of the Current Perspectives on Letters of Recommendation for Residency Applicants among Plastic Surgery Program Directors.整形外科项目主任对住院医师申请人推荐信的当前观点评估
Plast Surg Int. 2012;2012:728981. doi: 10.1155/2012/728981. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
6
The content and value of letters of recommendation in the resident candidate evaluative process.住院医师候选人评估过程中推荐信的内容与价值。
Curr Surg. 2002 Jan-Feb;59(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7944(01)00538-4.
7
Reliability in evaluating letters of recommendation.推荐信评估的可靠性。
Acad Med. 2000 Oct;75(10):1029. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200010000-00022.
8
A comparison of standardized and narrative letters of recommendation.标准化推荐信与叙述性推荐信的比较。
Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;5(11):1101-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02670.x.