• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用他们自己的话来说:关于新冠疫情期间育儿情况的定性研究

In Their Own Words: Qualitative Study of Parenting During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

作者信息

Tucker Quinn, Sege Robert, Stephens Allison, Suthar Twinkle, Purdue Eliza Loren, Browne Charlyn Harper, Burstein Dina

机构信息

Center for Community-Engaged Medicine, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Tufts University, Medford, MA; and.

出版信息

J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2025 Jun 17;46(3):e292-e299. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001363.

DOI:10.1097/DBP.0000000000001363
PMID:40526415
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12175968/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors aimed to understand the experience of parents and caregivers during COVID-19, including the challenges they faced and what helped them cope using the Strengthening Families (SF) Approach and Protective Factors Framework's five factors: parental resilience, social connections, knowledge of parenting and child development, concrete support in times of need, and social and emotional competence of children.

METHODS

The Family Snapshot Survey was developed to assess the impact of COVID-19 on family life, including items for quantitative analysis and 2 open-ended responses. This national survey of 9000 parents recruited from an opt-in internet panel was conducted in 3 waves of 3000 in November 2020, February 2021, and July 2021 using the online YouGov platform. The 2 open-ended responses are analyzed here using qualitative thematic analysis based on the SF Approach and Protective Factors Framework for caregivers with children aged 0 to 5 years.

RESULTS

The SF factors were used to classify 770 responses, with many responses identified as containing multiple factors, representing their interrelated nature. A lack of concrete support was the most frequent challenge, and parental resilience was the most frequent support.

CONCLUSION

Access or lack of access to concrete support in times of need underscored many of the strengths and challenges, respectively. Participants described interactions between individual protective factors that allowed for safety, stability, or positive experiences. In future community policy creation, policymakers may look at how programs interact and allow families to access multiple protective factors at once, with a critical need for providing these concrete supports.

摘要

目的

作者旨在了解新冠疫情期间家长和照料者的经历,包括他们面临的挑战,以及运用强化家庭(SF)方法和保护因素框架中的五个因素——家长复原力、社会联系、育儿及儿童发展知识、在需要时的具体支持以及儿童的社会和情感能力——来帮助他们应对困难的情况。

方法

开展了家庭快照调查,以评估新冠疫情对家庭生活的影响,包括用于定量分析的项目和两条开放式回答。这项针对从自愿参与的互联网小组招募的9000名家长的全国性调查,于2020年11月、2021年2月和2021年7月分三批进行,每批3000人,通过在线舆观平台进行。本文基于SF方法和保护因素框架,对0至5岁儿童照料者的两条开放式回答进行定性主题分析。

结果

利用SF因素对770条回答进行分类,许多回答被确定包含多个因素,体现了它们的相互关联性。缺乏具体支持是最常见的挑战,而家长复原力是最常见的支持因素。

结论

在需要时能否获得具体支持,分别凸显了许多优势和挑战。参与者描述了个体保护因素之间的相互作用,这些作用带来了安全、稳定或积极的体验。在未来制定社区政策时,政策制定者可以考虑各项计划之间如何相互作用,以及如何让家庭能够同时获得多种保护因素,尤其迫切需要提供这些具体支持。

相似文献

1
In Their Own Words: Qualitative Study of Parenting During the COVID-19 Pandemic.用他们自己的话来说:关于新冠疫情期间育儿情况的定性研究
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2025 Jun 17;46(3):e292-e299. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001363.
2
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
What Matters Most? An Exploration of Quality of Life Through the Everyday Experiences of Autistic Young People and Adults.最重要的是什么?通过自闭症青少年和成年人的日常经历探索生活质量。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):312-323. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0127. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Parents' experiences of psychotherapeutic support on the neonatal unit: A mixed methods systematic review to inform intervention development for a multicultural population.父母在新生儿病房接受心理治疗支持的经历:一项混合方法的系统评价,为多元文化人群的干预发展提供信息。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 May;30(3):e13194. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13194. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
6
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
7
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
9
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.一项针对参与美国在线调查研究的成年自闭症患者的政治经历和投票障碍的试点研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Towards a patient-centred definition for atopic dermatitis flare: a qualitative study of adults with atopic dermatitis.迈向以患者为中心的特应性皮炎发作定义:一项特应性皮炎成人患者的定性研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jun 20;191(1):82-91. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae037.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors of Corporal Punishment during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间体罚的预测因素
Pediatr Rep. 2024 Apr 19;16(2):300-312. doi: 10.3390/pediatric16020026.
2
Childcare Disruptions and Parental Stress During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的儿童保育中断和父母压力
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2024 Jan 1;45(1):e21-e30. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001241. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
3
Child Maltreatment During the Pandemic.儿童在疫情期间遭受的虐待。
Child Maltreat. 2023 Feb;28(1):3-6. doi: 10.1177/10775595221140911. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
4
Child maltreatment reporting during the initial weeks of COVID-19 in the US: Findings from NCANDS.美国 COVID-19 疫情初期的儿童虐待报告:来自 NCANDS 的调查结果。
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Dec;134:105929. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105929. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
5
Child Physical Abuse Did Not Increase During the Pandemic.大流行期间儿童身体虐待情况并未增加。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Apr 1;176(4):338-340. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.5476.
6
State Spending on Public Benefit Programs and Child Maltreatment.国家在公共福利计划上的支出与儿童虐待
Pediatrics. 2021 Nov;148(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-050685. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
7
Economic instability and child maltreatment risk: Evidence from state administrative data.经济不稳定与儿童虐待风险:来自州行政数据的证据。
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Aug;130(Pt 4):105213. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105213. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
8
Reasons for HOPE.带来希望的理由。
Pediatrics. 2021 May;147(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-013987.
9
Examining the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on family mental health in Canada: findings from a national cross-sectional study.考察 COVID-19 大流行对加拿大家庭心理健康的影响:一项全国性横断面研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):e042871. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042871.
10
Sampling Methods.抽样方法。
J Hum Lact. 2020 May;36(2):224-226. doi: 10.1177/0890334420906850. Epub 2020 Mar 10.