Vonck Kristl, Bodart Olivier, Weckhuysen Sarah, Tanghe Ann, Callebaut Britt, Verdonck Caroline, Van den Bergh Lynn, Legros Benjamin
Department Neurology - 4Brain, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Neurology Department, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
J Med Econ. 2025 Dec;28(1):990-1001. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2025.2520182. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
Cenobamate has recently been introduced as new anti-seizure medication (ASM) for patients with focal onset seizures (FOS) who are insufficiently controlled despite the use of three previous ASMs. To date, few evaluations have addressed the budgetary impact for the healthcare payer of add-on ASMs in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This study aims to assess the budgetary implications for the Belgian health insurer, the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI), if cenobamate were reimbursed for the adjuvant treatment of FOS in adults with DRE.
A prevalence-based budget impact model (BIM) was developed from the perspective of the Belgian NIHDI, considering all direct healthcare costs over a 3-year time horizon. A standardized expert elicitation process with experienced epileptologists was conducted to collect data on Belgian clinical practice. Source data uncertainty impact was investigated through a one-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA).
Over a 3-year period, considering the cumulative drug costs of cenobamate, replacement of other third-generation ASMs, and savings generated at medical cost level, the introduction of cenobamate as adjunctive treatment for the target population was estimated to reduce the NIHDI budget by -€8,105,616. The robustness of these savings was confirmed through an OWSA.
The savings at medical cost level fully offset the impact of cenobamate on the drug budget, leading to an overall healthcare budget saving of -€8,105,616 for NIHDI. This favourable outcome is largely due to cenobamate's high efficacy reflected in its high response rate and significant effect on reducing seizure frequency.
西诺巴胺最近被引入作为一种新型抗癫痫药物(ASM),用于治疗局灶性发作(FOS)患者,这些患者尽管使用了三种先前的ASM,但病情仍未得到充分控制。迄今为止,很少有评估涉及加用ASM对耐药性癫痫(DRE)患者医疗保健支付方的预算影响。本研究旨在评估如果西诺巴胺被报销用于DRE成年患者FOS的辅助治疗,对比利时健康保险公司——国家健康与残疾保险研究所(NIHDI)的预算影响。
从比利时NIHDI的角度开发了一种基于患病率的预算影响模型(BIM),考虑了三年时间范围内的所有直接医疗费用。与经验丰富的癫痫专家进行了标准化的专家意见征集过程,以收集比利时临床实践的数据。通过单向敏感性分析(OWSA)研究源数据不确定性影响。
在三年期间,考虑到西诺巴胺的累计药物成本、其他第三代ASM的替代以及医疗成本水平产生的节省,预计引入西诺巴胺作为目标人群的辅助治疗将使NIHDI预算减少8,105,616欧元。通过OWSA证实了这些节省的稳健性。
医疗成本水平的节省完全抵消了西诺巴胺对药物预算的影响,导致NIHDI的整体医疗保健预算节省8,105,616欧元。这一有利结果很大程度上归因于西诺巴胺的高疗效,体现在其高反应率和对降低癫痫发作频率的显著效果上。