Sun Yahui, Ji Yuanyuan, Lou Huijuan, Yao Junjie, Li Zhongxu, Xu Jing, Sun Yiping, Jiang Jinglei, Guo Meng, Cong Deyu
Affiliated Hospital of Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 13;104(24):e42851. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042851.
This study aimed to examine the effects of muscle-start-stop tuina and muscle belly tuina on the surface electromyography(sEMG) of chronic nonspecific neck pain. The research sought to provide empirical evidence for the efficacy of muscle start-stop tuina in treating chronic nonspecific neck pain.
A total of 60 patients diagnosed with chronic nonspecific neck pain were randomly allocated into 2 equal groups: an experimental group (n = 30) and a control group (n = 30). The experimental group received tuina treatment focused on the origin and insertion points of the trapezius muscle, while the control group received tuina treatment on the trapezius muscle belly. Both groups underwent 10 treatment sessions over a two-week period. To assess the efficacy of the interventions, patients' symptoms were evaluated using the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire. Additionally, muscle tone and endurance were quantified using sEMG to measure the root mean square and median frequency value decline rates.
The experimental and control groups exhibited statistically significant changes in Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire scores, sEMG root mean square values, and median frequency decline rates posttreatment compared to pretreatment measurements. Furthermore, statistically significant differences were observed in these parameters between the experimental group, which received tuina at the muscle origin and insertion, and the control group, which received tuina at the muscle belly.
Both the muscle-start-end tuina and muscle belly tuina techniques demonstrate efficacy in treating chronic nonspecific neck pain. However, the muscle-start-end tuina method exhibits superior outcomes in symptom alleviation, muscle tension reduction, and enhancement of muscle endurance compared to muscle belly tuina.
本研究旨在探讨肌肉起止点推拿和肌肉腹推拿对慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者表面肌电图(sEMG)的影响。该研究旨在为肌肉起止点推拿治疗慢性非特异性颈部疼痛的疗效提供实证依据。
总共60例被诊断为慢性非特异性颈部疼痛的患者被随机分为两组,每组30例:实验组和对照组。实验组接受针对斜方肌起止点的推拿治疗,而对照组接受斜方肌肌腹的推拿治疗。两组均在两周内接受10次治疗。为评估干预措施的疗效,使用诺思威克公园颈部疼痛问卷对患者症状进行评估。此外,使用sEMG对肌肉张力和耐力进行量化,以测量均方根值和中位频率值下降率。
与治疗前测量值相比,实验组和对照组在治疗后诺思威克公园颈部疼痛问卷评分、sEMG均方根值和中位频率下降率方面均出现了具有统计学意义的变化。此外,在接受肌肉起止点推拿的实验组和接受肌肉腹推拿的对照组之间,这些参数存在统计学显著差异。
肌肉起止点推拿和肌肉腹推拿技术在治疗慢性非特异性颈部疼痛方面均显示出疗效。然而,与肌肉腹推拿相比,肌肉起止点推拿方法在缓解症状、减轻肌肉紧张和增强肌肉耐力方面表现出更好的效果。