• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2012年实施新的药物警戒法规后八个选定国家药物不良反应报告的趋势:一项Joinpoint回归分析

Trends in adverse drug reaction reporting in eight selected countries after the implementation of new pharmacovigilance regulation in 2012: a joinpoint regression analysis.

作者信息

Masiliūnienė Greta, Stankevičius Edgaras, Kaduševičius Edmundas

机构信息

Institute of Physiology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, A. Mickevičiaus 9, 44307, Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03862-2.

DOI:10.1007/s00228-025-03862-2
PMID:40528085
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Underreporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) remains to be a challenge in modern health care. Major reforms in the EU pharmacovigilance system in 2012 introduced the legal basis for consumers to report suspected ADRs. This study was designed to determine trends in overall ADR reporting, the ratio of health care professional (HCP)-to-consumer ADR reporting, and the ratio of serious-to-nonserious ADR reporting for an 11-year period in the selected non-EU and EU countries that had implemented systems for consumers' reporting before the 2012 EU pharmacovigilance legislation and those that did not have.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The national competent authorities of 15 countries (11 EU countries, former EU member the UK, Australia, Canada, and the USA) were contacted via e-mail and asked to provide the total number of ADR reports, numbers of ADRs reported by consumers and HCPs, numbers of serious and nonserious ADRs, and top 5 medication groups causing ADRs by the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system during the period of 2012-2022. Eight countries, namely Belgium, Canada, Finland, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, and the UK, responded and provided the data. The trends of ADR reporting were evaluated with the joinpoint regression analysis method. The annual percent change (APC) and the average annual percent change (AAPC) were estimated.

RESULTS

Over the study period, the overall rates of ADR reporting increased significantly in all the countries except for Belgium, with the greatest AAPC being in Lithuania (AAPC of 32.34) and the lowest, in Canada (AAPC of 10.3). The ratios of HCP-to-consumer ADR reporting were significantly decreasing in all the countries (AAPC range, -43.7 to -24.9) except for Canada where an opposite significant trend toward an increasing HCP reporting rate (AAPC of 3.9) for 2012-2020 was observed. The ratios of serious-to-nonserious ADR reporting were significantly decreasing in more than half of the countries, namely Canada, Finland, Lithuania, the Netherlands, and Portugal, with the greatest negative AAPC being in Lithuania (AAPC of -32.9) and the smallest, in Canada (AAPC of -6.8). Vaccines (J07), immunosuppressants (L04), antineoplastic agents (L01), antibacterials for systemic use (J01), and antithrombotic agents (B01) were found to be the top 5 most frequently reported medications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the significant upward trends in overall ADR reporting not only in the countries that implemented consumer ADR reporting systems after the 2012 EU pharmacovigilance legislation but also in countries that had consumer reporting systems before 2012. Moreover, significant downward trends in the ratios of HCP-to-consumer ADR reporting were documented for all EU countries, confirming increasing consumers' involvement in ADR reporting. Further, larger scale studies with the involvement of more countries are needed to better understand the trends in ADR reporting, and multifaceted interventions are warranted to be installed to enhance ADR reporting.

摘要

背景与目的

在现代医疗保健中,药品不良反应(ADR)报告不足仍是一项挑战。2012年欧盟药物警戒系统的重大改革为消费者报告疑似药品不良反应引入了法律依据。本研究旨在确定在选定的非欧盟国家和欧盟国家中,在2012年欧盟药物警戒立法之前已实施消费者报告系统的国家以及未实施该系统的国家,11年间药品不良反应总体报告趋势、医疗保健专业人员(HCP)与消费者药品不良反应报告比例以及严重与非严重药品不良反应报告比例。

材料与方法

通过电子邮件联系了15个国家(11个欧盟国家、前欧盟成员国英国、澳大利亚、加拿大和美国)的国家主管当局,要求提供2012 - 2022年期间药品不良反应报告总数、消费者和医疗保健专业人员报告的药品不良反应数量、严重和非严重药品不良反应数量以及根据解剖治疗化学(ATC)分类系统导致药品不良反应的前5类药物组。八个国家,即比利时、加拿大、芬兰、立陶宛、荷兰、葡萄牙、瑞典和英国,做出了回应并提供了数据。采用连接点回归分析方法评估药品不良反应报告趋势。估计了年度百分比变化(APC)和平均年度百分比变化(AAPC)。

结果

在研究期间,除比利时外,所有国家的药品不良反应总体报告率均显著上升,AAPC最高的是立陶宛(3年2.34),最低的是加拿大(10.3)。除加拿大外,所有国家的医疗保健专业人员与消费者药品不良反应报告比例均显著下降(AAPC范围为-43.7至-24.9),在加拿大观察到2012 - 2020年医疗保健专业人员报告率呈相反的显著上升趋势(AAPC为3.9)。在一半以上的国家,即加拿大、芬兰、立陶宛、荷兰和葡萄牙,严重与非严重药品不良反应报告比例显著下降,AAPC最大的是立陶宛(-32.9),最小的是加拿大(-6.8)。疫苗(J07)、免疫抑制剂(L04)、抗肿瘤药(L01)、全身用抗菌药(J01)和抗血栓药(B01)是报告最频繁的前5类药物。

结论

本研究表明,不仅在2012年欧盟药物警戒立法后实施消费者药品不良反应报告系统的国家,而且在2012年前就有消费者报告系统的国家,药品不良反应总体报告均有显著上升趋势。此外记录显示,所有欧盟国家医疗保健专业人员与消费者药品不良反应报告比例均有显著下降趋势,证实消费者在药品不良反应报告中的参与度不断提高。此外,需要开展更多国家参与的更大规模研究,以更好地了解药品不良反应报告趋势,并且有必要采取多方面干预措施来加强药品不良反应报告。

相似文献

1
Trends in adverse drug reaction reporting in eight selected countries after the implementation of new pharmacovigilance regulation in 2012: a joinpoint regression analysis.2012年实施新的药物警戒法规后八个选定国家药物不良反应报告的趋势:一项Joinpoint回归分析
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1007/s00228-025-03862-2.
2
Patient versus healthcare professional spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting: a systematic review.患者与医疗保健专业人员自发药物不良反应报告:系统评价。
Drug Saf. 2012 Oct 1;35(10):807-18. doi: 10.1007/BF03261977.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
How to promote adverse drug reaction reports using information systems - a systematic review and meta-analysis.如何利用信息系统促进药品不良反应报告——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Mar 1;16:27. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0265-8.
5
Signals of Adverse Reactions to Herbal Medicines: Evidence and Document Analysis Based on a Scoping Review.草药不良反应信号:基于范围综述的证据与文献分析
Drug Saf. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01580-3.
6
Comparison of the Completeness of Spontaneously Reported Adverse Drug Reactions by Consumers, Healthcare Professionals, and Pharmaceutical Companies: An Evaluation of Databases From Two High-Income Countries.消费者、医疗保健专业人员和制药公司自发报告的药品不良反应完整性比较:对两个高收入国家数据库的评估
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2025 Aug;13(4):e70164. doi: 10.1002/prp2.70164.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Vanessa's Law on the Reporting of Serious Adverse Events: A Retrospective Study Among Antiplatelet Users in a Tertiary-Care Cardiology Centre.《凡妮莎法案》对严重不良事件报告的影响:一项针对三级医疗心血管中心抗血小板药物使用者的回顾性研究
CJC Open. 2024 Sep 12;6(12):1527-1533. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.09.003. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Underreporting of adverse events to health authorities by healthcare professionals: a red flag-raising descriptive study.医疗保健专业人员向卫生当局少报不良事件:一项警示性描述性研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Dec 25;36(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae109.
3
Evaluating the costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a systematic review.
评估住院患者药物不良事件的成本:一项系统综述。
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Feb 8;14(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00481-y.
4
Factors Associated with Underreporting of Adverse Drug Reactions by Health Care Professionals: A Systematic Review Update.与医疗保健专业人员报告药物不良反应不足相关的因素:系统评价更新。
Drug Saf. 2023 Jul;46(7):625-636. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01302-7. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
5
Factors associated with underreporting of adverse drug reactions by patients: a systematic review.与患者不良反应漏报相关的因素:一项系统评价。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Dec;45(6):1349-1358. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01592-y. Epub 2023 May 29.
6
Differences in reporting of adverse drug reactions due to COVID-19 vaccines depending on the reporter.因报告者不同而导致的COVID-19疫苗药物不良反应报告差异。
Eur J Intern Med. 2023 Jul;113:104-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.03.020. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
7
Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 Vaccines: Perspective from the European Medicines Agency.COVID-19 疫苗的安全性监测:来自欧洲药品管理局的观点。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jun;113(6):1223-1234. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2828. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
8
Twenty-First Century Global ADR Management: A Need for Clarification, Redesign, and Coordinated Action.二十一世纪全球 ADR 管理:需要澄清、重新设计和协调行动。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2023 Jan;57(1):100-103. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00443-8. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
9
Adverse drug reactions, multimorbidity and polypharmacy: a prospective analysis of 1 month of medical admissions.药物不良反应、多种合并症和多种药物治疗:对 1 个月医疗入院的前瞻性分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 4;12(7):e055551. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055551.
10
Under-Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in Finland and Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on How to Improve Reporting.芬兰药品不良反应报告不足以及医疗保健专业人员对如何改进报告的看法
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 31;10(6):1015. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10061015.