Comparison of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus immunotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: efficacy and safety outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Recent advancements in immunotherapy have demonstrated promising results across various solid tumors, prompting the exploration of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (NICT) as a potential alternative. This study sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of NICT in comparison with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing radical esophagectomy.

METHODS

From January 2019 to September 2023, a total of 472 patients with locally advanced ESCC who met the eligibility criteria were recruited from three different medical centers. All patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy prior to radical esophagectomy. Among them, 252 patients treated with the NCRT regimen, and 220 patients treated with the NICT regimen. To reduce the influence of potential confounding factors between the two cohorts, propensity score matching (PSM) was applied.

RESULTS

Following PSM, an analysis was conducted on 350 patients who received either NCRT or NICT, with 175 individuals in each cohort. The NCRT cohort exhibited a significantly greater rate of pathological complete response (pCR) than the NICT cohort (44.57% 16.00%, P<0.001). The occurrence of postoperative complications was lower in the NICT cohort, with rates of 31.43% compared with 45.14% in the NCRT group (P=0.008). After 12 months of follow-up, no significant difference was observed in the disease-free survival (DFS) rate between the NCRT group and the NICT group (82.2% 88.0%, P=0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

The NCRT cohort exhibited greater rates of pCR and lymph node pCR rates than the NICT cohort. Conversely, the NICT group presented with fewer postoperative complications the NCRT group.