Song Si-Kai, Zhu Jiang, Feng Hai-Min, Ma An-She, Yang Chao-Gang
Department of Abdominal Surgery, The Third People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830000, Xinjiang, PR China.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, Hubei, PR China.
Surg Pract Sci. 2025 May 29;21:100287. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100287. eCollection 2025 Jun.
The consistency between clinical and pathological staging of lymph nodes (LNs) in gastric cancer (GC) remains suboptimal, and there is currently no standardized imaging criterion for diagnosing lymph node metastasis (LNM). This study aimed to elucidate the differences in LNs among various groups, regions, and stages, utilizing imaging and histopathology as the foundational basis.
We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 100 GC patients who underwent surgical treatment at Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University between January 2022 and May 2023. Patient characteristics, along with pathological and radiological data of LNs, were collected and compared across different groups, regions, and stages.
Pathologically, 3566 LNs were collected, with a median of 35 (range: 17-72). Radiologically, 2233 LNs were collected, with a median of 22 (range: 3-47). Significant differences were observed in the long-axis diameter (LAD), short-axis diameter (SAD), ratios of long to short axis (RLSA), and product of long and short axis (PLSA) between negative and positive LNs. However, only within group 3 did the RLSA show statistical significance upon grouping analysis. The areas under the curve (AUC) for LAD, SAD, PLSA, and their combination index (CI) in diagnosing LNM were 0.817, 0.817, 0.828, and 0.827, respectively. Diverse groups, regions, and stages exerted a more pronounced influence on LN groups 1-6, while having a comparatively lesser impact on LN groups 7-16.
LAD, SAD, and PLSA exhibited significant diagnostic value for LNM and could serve as diagnostic criteria; however, RLSA demonstrated limited diagnostic utility. The formulation of diagnostic criteria should consider the impact of groups, regions, and stages to enhance sensitivity and specificity.
胃癌(GC)中淋巴结(LNs)的临床分期与病理分期之间的一致性仍不尽人意,目前尚无诊断淋巴结转移(LNM)的标准化影像学标准。本研究旨在以影像学和组织病理学为基础,阐明不同组、区域和分期的淋巴结差异。
我们回顾性分析了2022年1月至2023年5月在武汉大学中南医院接受手术治疗的100例GC患者的临床资料。收集患者特征以及淋巴结的病理和放射学数据,并在不同组、区域和分期之间进行比较。
病理上,共收集3566个淋巴结,中位数为35个(范围:17 - 72个)。放射学上,共收集2233个淋巴结,中位数为22个(范围:3 - 47个)。阴性和阳性淋巴结在长轴直径(LAD)、短轴直径(SAD)、长短轴比值(RLSA)和长短轴乘积(PLSA)方面存在显著差异。然而,仅在第3组中,分组分析时RLSA具有统计学意义。LAD、SAD、PLSA及其联合指数(CI)诊断LNM的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.817、0.817、0.828和0.827。不同的组、区域和分期对第1 - 6组淋巴结的影响更为明显,而对第7 - 16组淋巴结的影响相对较小。
LAD、SAD和PLSA对LNM具有显著的诊断价值,可作为诊断标准;然而,RLSA的诊断效用有限。诊断标准的制定应考虑组、区域和分期的影响,以提高敏感性和特异性。