Is Prophylactic Splenectomy Necessary for Proximal Advanced Gastric Cancer Invading the Greater Curvature with Clinically Negative Splenic Hilar Lymph Node Metastasis? A Multi-Institutional Cohort Study (YCOG2003).

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic splenectomy for hilar lymph node (#10) dissection has shown no survival benefit for patients with proximal advanced gastric cancer that does not invade the greater curvature. However, the survival benefit of prophylactic splenectomy for proximal advanced gastric cancer invading the greater curvature side, particularly for clinically negative #10 lymph node metastasis (#10[-]) cases remains controversial.

METHODS

This multi-institutional retrospective study enrolled 146 consecutive patients with proximal advanced gastric cancers invading the greater curvature side with clinical #10(-) who underwent R0 total gastrectomy. For 33 of these patients, splenectomy was performed, and the remaining 113 underwent spleen-preservation gastrectomy. Short- and long-term results were compared between the splenectomy and spleen-preservation groups, with the incidence of #10 metastasis in the splenectomy group and recurrence in the spleen-preservation group compared.

RESULTS

In the splenectomy group, longer operative time, greater blood loss, more frequent postoperative abdominal infection, and longer hospital stay were observed than in the spleen-preservation group. The two groups exhibited no differences in median relapse-free survival time (31.1 vs 59.8 months; P = 0.684) or median overall survival time (64.9 vs 65.1 months; P = 0.765). The pathologic #10 lymph node metastasis rate was 3% in the splenectomy group, and the #10 lymph node recurrence rate was 2.7% in the spleen-preservation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic splenectomy showed more frequent postoperative morbidities and a longer hospital stay than spleen preservation, without any long-term survival benefits.