Suppr超能文献

超越融合:评估三级颈椎间盘置换术的疗效前景。

Beyond Fusion: Assessing the Horizon of 3-level Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Outcomes.

作者信息

Yang Hanzhi, Chi Jialun, Vengsarkar Ved A, Xu Zhiwen, Zhang Yi, Boyapati Rohan, Wang Jesse, Labaran Lawal, Jin Li, Li Xudong

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ.

出版信息

Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001861.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate postoperative medical and surgical outcomes of 3-level cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) in comparison to 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical disk arthroplasty has emerged as a noninferior alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. However, few studies investigated the clinical outcomes of 3-level CDA. At present, CDAs beyond 2-level are performed as off-labeled procedures across the United States and can be deemed experimental by insurance companies.

METHODS

Three-level CDA and 3-level ACDF patients between 18 and 84 years old from 2010 to 2020 were identified within the PearlDiver database. Ninety-day postoperative medical and surgical complications, emergency department visits, and readmission were measured. Two-year complications and 4-year rate of revisions were also studied. The Pearson χ2 test was used to assess demographics and pre-existing comorbidities. Independent effects of CDA and ACDF on the postoperative outcomes were determined with multivariable logistic regression after adjusting for demographic factors and pertinent comorbidities. PearlDiver Bellwether was used to conduct all statistical analyses via its research query interface.

RESULTS

After matching 2901 three-level CDA patients with 14,378 ACDF patients, multivariate analysis showed that the CDA group had a significantly lower rate of 90-day dysphagia, pneumonia, wound complications, and surgical site infections. CDA patients also showed a reduced rate of 90-day ED visits and readmission. At the 2-year follow-up, CDA patients had a lower rate of instrumentation failure. At 4 years, 786 CDA patients and 3890 ACDF patients remained, and the CDA group had a lower posterior revision rate and a less overall revision rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study represents the largest comparative study examining clinical outcomes following 3-level CDA. CDA established itself as a safe and noninferior procedure to ACDF. However, the safety and efficacy of 3-level CDA require more long-term data to validate.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

目的

比较三级颈椎间盘置换术(CDA)与三级颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)的术后医学及手术结局。

背景数据总结

颈椎间盘置换术已成为颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术的非劣效替代方案。然而,很少有研究调查三级CDA的临床结局。目前,在美国,超过二级的CDA手术属于未获批准的手术,保险公司可能将其视为实验性手术。

方法

在PearlDiver数据库中识别出2010年至2020年间年龄在18至84岁的三级CDA和三级ACDF患者。测量术后90天的医学及手术并发症、急诊就诊情况和再入院情况。还研究了两年期并发症和四年期翻修率。采用Pearson卡方检验评估人口统计学特征和既往合并症。在调整人口统计学因素和相关合并症后,通过多变量逻辑回归确定CDA和ACDF对术后结局的独立影响。通过PearlDiver Bellwether的研究查询界面进行所有统计分析。

结果

在将2901例三级CDA患者与14378例ACDF患者进行匹配后,多变量分析显示,CDA组90天吞咽困难、肺炎、伤口并发症和手术部位感染的发生率显著较低。CDA患者90天急诊就诊和再入院率也较低。在两年随访时,CDA患者器械失败率较低。在四年时,仍有786例CDA患者和3890例ACDF患者,CDA组后路翻修率较低,总体翻修率也较低。

结论

本研究是规模最大的比较三级CDA术后临床结局的研究。CDA已证明自身是一种安全且不劣于ACDF的手术。然而,三级CDA的安全性和有效性需要更多长期数据来验证。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验