• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱尔兰对压力性尿失禁手术的态度:应对中尿道吊带术使用的暂停

Attitudes towards stress urinary incontinence surgery in Ireland: navigating the pause on mid-urethral sling use.

作者信息

Rotem Reut, Hickey Muireann, Galvin Daniel, O'Sullivan Suzanne, Brady Ciaran, O'Sullivan Orfhlaith E

机构信息

Department of Urogynaecology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, affiliated with the, Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-03986-5.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-025-03986-5
PMID:40531291
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mid-urethral slings (MUS) for the surgical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) have been suspended in Ireland since July 2018, significantly impacting treatment options and clinical practice.

AIMS

This study aimed to explore the attitudes of consultant obstetricians, gynaecologists, and urologists in Ireland toward SUI surgery following the MUS suspension, including their prior practices, current approaches, and views on MUS safety and potential reinstatement.

METHODS

A descriptive, anonymized questionnaire was electronically distributed in early 2023 to consultant members of the Irish Society of Urology and the Continence Foundation of Ireland. Non-consultants, non-medical professionals, and respondents outside Ireland were excluded. Data were analyzed using SPSS v28.

RESULTS

Before the 2018 suspension, 89.5% (17/19) of respondents performed SUI surgeries, with 76.5% (13/17) using MUS-retropubic and 53% (9/17) MUS-transobturator techniques. Post-suspension, 63.2% (12/19) continued performing SUI surgery, primarily urethral bulking (83.3%, 10/12). Regarding safety, 83.3% (15/18) believed MUS led to fewer instances of post-operative voiding dysfunction and 66.7% (12/18) reported fewer complications such as vault prolapse or rectocele. Notably, 44.4% (8/18) had been involved in litigation related to MUS. Despite this, 52.6% (10/19) expressed willingness to resume MUS if the suspension was lifted.

CONCLUSIONS

MUS was the preferred SUI procedure prior to suspension due to perceived safety and effectiveness. Over half of consultants surveyed would consider resuming its use, highlighting a need for diverse, evidence-based treatment options and calling for a re-evaluation of the current suspension.

摘要

背景

自2018年7月起,爱尔兰已暂停使用治疗压力性尿失禁(SUI)的中段尿道吊带术(MUS),这对治疗选择和临床实践产生了重大影响。

目的

本研究旨在探讨爱尔兰的妇产科顾问医生和泌尿科医生在MUS暂停使用后对SUI手术的态度,包括他们以前的做法、当前的方法以及对MUS安全性和可能恢复使用的看法。

方法

2023年初,一份描述性的匿名问卷通过电子方式分发给爱尔兰泌尿外科学会和爱尔兰尿失禁基金会的顾问成员。非顾问医生、非医学专业人员以及爱尔兰境外的受访者被排除在外。使用SPSS v28对数据进行分析。

结果

在2018年暂停使用之前,89.5%(17/19)的受访者进行SUI手术,其中76.5%(13/17)使用耻骨后MUS技术,53%(9/17)使用经闭孔MUS技术。暂停使用后,63.2%(12/19)的受访者继续进行SUI手术,主要是尿道填充术(83.3%,10/12)。关于安全性,83.3%(15/18)的人认为MUS导致术后排尿功能障碍的情况较少,66.7%(12/18)的人报告并发症如穹窿脱垂或直肠膨出较少。值得注意的是,44.4%(8/18)的人曾参与与MUS相关的诉讼。尽管如此,如果暂停使用解除,52.6%(10/19)的人表示愿意恢复使用MUS。

结论

由于其安全性和有效性,MUS在暂停使用之前是首选的SUI手术方法。超过一半接受调查的顾问医生会考虑恢复使用,这凸显了对多样化、基于证据的治疗选择的需求,并呼吁对当前的暂停使用进行重新评估。

相似文献

1
Attitudes towards stress urinary incontinence surgery in Ireland: navigating the pause on mid-urethral sling use.爱尔兰对压力性尿失禁手术的态度:应对中尿道吊带术使用的暂停
Ir J Med Sci. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s11845-025-03986-5.
2
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的经尿道中段吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4.
3
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3.
4
Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation.压力性尿失禁女性的外科治疗:ESTER系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(14):1-306. doi: 10.3310/hta23140.
5
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub3.
6
Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence.针对患有或未患有压力性尿失禁的盆腔器官脱垂女性的手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 19;8(8):CD013108. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013108.
7
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 1(6):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub2.
8
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.经阴道单切口吊带术治疗女性尿失禁。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 27;10(10):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub4.
9
Urethral bulking agents versus other surgical procedures for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.尿道填充剂与其他外科手术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Jun;189:48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
10
Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.耻骨后开放式阴道膀胱悬吊术治疗女性尿失禁
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 25;7(7):CD002912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002912.pub7.

本文引用的文献

1
Rates of subjective and objective cure, satisfaction, and pain 10-20 years after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) surgery: A retrospective cohort study.经阴道无张力吊带(TVT)手术后 10-20 年的主观和客观治愈率、满意度和疼痛率:一项回顾性队列研究。
BJOG. 2024 Jul;131(8):1146-1153. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17738. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
2
Clinical Outcomes of Mid-Urethral Sling (MUS) Procedures for the Treatment of Female Urinary Incontinence: A Multicenter Study.用于治疗女性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带术(MUS)的临床结果:一项多中心研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 9;11(22):6656. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226656.
3
The efficacy and complications of retropubic tension-free vaginal tapes after 20 years: A prospective observational study.
20 年后经耻骨后无张力阴道吊带术的疗效和并发症:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BJOG. 2023 Jan;130(1):107-113. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17282. Epub 2022 Sep 11.
4
Single-Incision Mini-Slings for Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women.用于女性压力性尿失禁的单切口微型吊带
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 31;386(13):1230-1243. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111815.
5
Effectiveness and safety of bulking agents versus surgical methods in women with stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.填充剂与手术方法治疗女性压力性尿失禁的有效性和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Apr;33(4):777-787. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04937-1. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
6
Contemporary trends for urological training and management of stress urinary incontinence in Ireland.爱尔兰泌尿科培训和压力性尿失禁管理的当代趋势。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Oct;32(10):2841-2846. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04887-8. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
7
Short-, mid-, and long-term incontinence outcomes in women undergoing mid-urethral sling procedures: a retrospective cohort study.接受中段尿道吊带手术的女性的短期、中期和长期尿失禁结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Mar;32(3):609-614. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04393-3. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
8
Investigation of body image, self-esteem, and quality of life in women with urinary incontinence.尿失禁女性的身体意象、自尊及生活质量调查
Int J Nurs Pract. 2019 Oct;25(5):e12762. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12762. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
9
TVT versus TOT in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经阴道无张力尿道中段悬吊带术(TVT)与耻骨后尿道中段吊带术(TOT)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的系统评价和Meta分析
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Nov 20;14:2293-2303. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S169014. eCollection 2018.
10
Changing surgical trends for female stress urinary incontinence in England.英国女性压力性尿失禁手术趋势的变化
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Feb;30(2):203-209. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3839-4. Epub 2018 Dec 6.