Shammas Ronnie L, Levy Jacob, Boe Lillian A, Wagner Benjamin, Graziano Francis D, Hespe Geoffrey E, Matros Evan, Nelson Jonas A, Mehrara Babak J
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012262.
Radiation significantly increases the risk of capsular contracture after implant-based breast reconstruction. However, the relationship between anatomic plane placement (e.g. submuscular or prepectoral) and the development of capsular contracture remains unclear. This study compares the risk of radiation-induced capsular contracture in patients who undergo two-stage prepectoral versus submuscular implant reconstruction.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent two-stage implant reconstruction with radiation to the tissue expander between 2010-2024 at a single institution. Capsular contracture was evaluated and classified by the Baker scale; patients with documented Baker II, III, or IV capsules were considered to have developed capsular contracture. Cox proportional hazards models identified predictors of contracture, and Kaplan-Meier curves estimated the cumulative incidence in prepectoral versus submuscular reconstruction.
585 patients were included; 116 underwent prepectoral and 469 underwent submuscular implant placement. Capsular contracture occurred in 62% of submuscular and 18% of prepectoral patients (p<0.001). The estimated 48-month cumulative incidence of capsular contracture was 61% (95% CI: 56-65%) for submuscular and 35% (95% CI: 19-47%) for prepectoral reconstruction (p<0.001). Submuscular implant placement was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing capsular contracture over time than prepectoral reconstruction (HR: 3.00, 95% CI: 1.88-4.79; p<0.001).
In the setting of radiation, submuscular implant placement is associated with a significantly higher risk of capsular contracture compared to prepectoral placement. These findings emphasize the need for thorough patient counseling regarding the risks of capsular contracture and the importance of individualized reconstructive planning to optimize outcomes in patients undergoing radiation.
放射治疗会显著增加植入式乳房重建术后包膜挛缩的风险。然而,解剖平面放置(如胸大肌下或胸大肌前)与包膜挛缩的发生之间的关系仍不明确。本研究比较了接受两阶段胸大肌前与胸大肌下植入物重建的患者发生放射诱导包膜挛缩的风险。
我们对2010年至2024年在单一机构接受组织扩张器放射治疗的两阶段植入物重建患者进行了回顾性分析。根据贝克量表对包膜挛缩进行评估和分类;记录为贝克II级、III级或IV级包膜的患者被认为发生了包膜挛缩。Cox比例风险模型确定了挛缩的预测因素,Kaplan-Meier曲线估计了胸大肌前与胸大肌下重建的累积发生率。
纳入585例患者;116例行胸大肌前植入,469例行胸大肌下植入。胸大肌下患者中62%发生包膜挛缩,胸大肌前患者中18%发生包膜挛缩(p<0.001)。胸大肌下重建的包膜挛缩估计48个月累积发生率为61%(95%CI:56-65%),胸大肌前重建为35%(95%CI:19-47%)(p<0.001)。随着时间的推移,胸大肌下植入与发生包膜挛缩的风险显著高于胸大肌前重建(HR:3.00,95%CI:1.88-4.79;p<0.001)。
在放射治疗的情况下,与胸大肌前放置相比,胸大肌下植入物放置与包膜挛缩的风险显著更高。这些发现强调了对患者进行关于包膜挛缩风险的全面咨询的必要性,以及个性化重建计划对优化接受放射治疗患者的结局的重要性。