Elsaman Ahmed, Abdelmageed Shrouk, Daifallah Osama Sayed
Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.
Clin Rheumatol. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1007/s10067-025-07534-5.
This study aimed to compare the effects of supra-scapular nerve block, posterior intra-articular hydro-dilatation, and hydro-dilatation of the shoulder interval, in terms of improving pain, function, and range of motion in patients with adhesive capsulitis.
A total of 50 patients diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis were randomly divided into three groups. The first group received a suprascapular nerve block, the second group underwent posterior intra-articular hydro-dilatation, and the third group underwent shoulder interval hydro-dilatation. Patient assessment was conducted using visual analogue scale for pain, shoulder pain and disability index, and measurements of range of motion.
Group 1 experienced rapid and sustained pain reduction (p-value < 0.001 at both baseline vs. first follow-up and baseline vs. second follow-up), with non-significant improvement in internal rotation after 12 weeks (p value = 0.330). Group 2 showed delayed improvement in internal rotation (p-value = 0.068), but more sustained pain reduction (p-value < 0.001) and improved range of motion in all directions at the 12-week mark. Group 3 exhibited rapid pain reduction (p-value < 0.001) and improved range of motion, but non-significant improvements in internal (p-value = 0.131) and external rotation (p-value = 0.052) after 12 weeks.
Although no significant differences were observed among the three groups, we recommend posterior intra-articular hydro-dilatation as it yielded the most promising and sustainable outcomes as regard pain reduction and range of motion improvement. Suprascapular nerve block is recommended for patients with prominent pain symptoms. Rotator interval hydro-dilatation is the least recommended intervention, being the most challenging and painful technique, and as it demonstrated a less sustained effect on range of motion. Key Points • This study aimed to find the best treatment modality for adhesive capsulitis through comparing the effects of suprascapular nerve block, posterior intra-articular hydro-dilatation, and hydro-dilatation of the shoulder interval. • Although no significant differences were found among three modalities, posterior intra-articular hydro-dilatation showed the best long-term outcomes for pain and range of motion. Suprascapular nerve block is recommended for patients with severe pain, while hydro-dilatation of the shoulder interval had less lasting benefits.
本研究旨在比较肩胛上神经阻滞、关节内后侧水扩张术和肩间隙水扩张术对改善肩周炎患者疼痛、功能和活动范围的效果。
总共50例被诊断为肩周炎的患者被随机分为三组。第一组接受肩胛上神经阻滞,第二组接受关节内后侧水扩张术,第三组接受肩间隙水扩张术。使用视觉模拟疼痛量表、肩部疼痛和功能障碍指数以及活动范围测量对患者进行评估。
第一组疼痛迅速且持续减轻(基线与首次随访以及基线与第二次随访时的p值均<0.001),12周后内旋改善不显著(p值 = 0.330)。第二组内旋改善出现延迟(p值 = 0.068),但疼痛减轻更持久(p值<0.001),且在12周时所有方向的活动范围均有改善。第三组疼痛迅速减轻(p值<0.001)且活动范围改善,但12周后内旋(p值 = 0.131)和外旋(p值 = 0.052)改善不显著。
尽管三组之间未观察到显著差异,但我们推荐关节内后侧水扩张术,因为在减轻疼痛和改善活动范围方面,它产生了最有前景和可持续的结果。对于疼痛症状突出的患者,推荐肩胛上神经阻滞。肩间隙水扩张术是最不推荐的干预措施,因为它是最具挑战性和疼痛的技术,并且对活动范围的影响持续时间较短。要点 • 本研究旨在通过比较肩胛上神经阻滞、关节内后侧水扩张术和肩间隙水扩张术的效果,找到肩周炎的最佳治疗方式。 • 尽管三种方式之间未发现显著差异,但关节内后侧水扩张术在疼痛和活动范围方面显示出最佳的长期效果。对于疼痛严重的患者,推荐肩胛上神经阻滞,而肩间隙水扩张术的益处持续时间较短。