Lei Z X, Sang D, Lan B, Fan Y, Cai R G, Luo Y, Li Q, Wang J Y, Zhao L M, Yuan P
Department of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/ National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Department of Integrated Section I, Beijing Sanhuan Cancer Hospital, Beijing 100021, China.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 23;47(6):517-524. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20241115-00503.
To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the trastuzumab originator (HST) versus its biosimilar (HLX02) combined with pertuzumab and chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with HER-2-positive breast cancer. This retrospective cohort study included 175 patients with HER-2-positive breast cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by curative surgery at the Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between October 2020 and January 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the trastuzumab formulation used: the HST group (=89) and the HLX02 group (=86).The efficacy, safety, and trastuzumab-related treatment costs were compared between the two groups. Moreover, using Logistic regression model to identify the factors influencing total pathological complete response (tpCR) rates. There were statistically significant differences in clinical T stage and surgical approach between the HST and HLX02 groups (<0.05). Other clinicopathological characteristics, such as age and histological grade, showed no statistically significant differences (>0.05), with most baseline characteristics remaining balanced between the two groups. There were no significant differences in tpCR rates (=0.957) or Miller-Payne (MP) grading rates (=0.991) between the HST and HLX02 groups. The tpCR rates for the two groups were 55.1% (49/89) and 54.7% (47/86), respectively. The rates of achieving grade 5 (G5) in the postoperative MP pathological grading system were 55.1% (49/89) and 55.8% (48/86), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (=0.991). Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses showed that hormone receptor status is an independent risk factor affecting tpCR (=0.31, 95% ; 0.16-0.61, <0.001). The incidence of adverse event during neoadjuvant therapy was similar between the groups, with no occurrences of trastuzumab-related cardiac toxicity. The HLX02 regimen showed a lower cost-effectiveness ratio (586.48 vs. 604.96) and reduced trastuzumab treatment costs during neoadjuvant therapy compared to HST [tpCR:(31 208.37±2 191.00) CNY vs. (33 224.49±2 741.00) CNY; non-tpCR: 33 030.05±5 787.00) CNY vs. (33 412.50±4 203.00) CNY, <0.05]. In the neoadjuvant treatment of early-stage HER-2-positive breast cancer, HLX02 combined with pertuzumab and chemotherapy demonstrates similar efficacy and safety to the trastuzumab originator, while offering a significant cost advantage.
比较曲妥珠单抗原研药(HST)与其生物类似药(HLX02)联合帕妥珠单抗及化疗作为新辅助治疗用于HER-2阳性乳腺癌患者的疗效、安全性和成本效益。这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2020年10月至2024年1月期间在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院接受新辅助治疗后进行根治性手术的175例HER-2阳性乳腺癌患者。根据所用曲妥珠单抗制剂将患者分为两组:HST组(n = 89)和HLX02组(n = 86)。比较两组之间的疗效、安全性及曲妥珠单抗相关治疗费用。此外,使用逻辑回归模型确定影响总病理完全缓解(tpCR)率的因素。HST组和HLX02组在临床T分期和手术方式上存在统计学显著差异(P<0.05)。其他临床病理特征,如年龄和组织学分级,无统计学显著差异(P>0.05),两组之间的大多数基线特征保持平衡。HST组和HLX02组在tpCR率(P = 0.957)或米勒-佩恩(MP)分级率(P = 0.991)方面无显著差异。两组的tpCR率分别为55.1%(49/89)和54.7%(47/86)。术后MP病理分级系统中达到5级(G5)的比例分别为55.1%(49/89)和55.8%(48/86),无统计学显著差异(P = 0.991)。单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析显示,激素受体状态是影响tpCR的独立危险因素(P = 0.31,95%CI:0.16 - 0.61,P<0.001)。新辅助治疗期间两组不良事件发生率相似,未发生曲妥珠单抗相关心脏毒性。与HST相比,HLX02方案显示出更低的成本效益比(586.48对604.96),且新辅助治疗期间曲妥珠单抗治疗成本降低[tpCR:(31 208.37±2 191.00)元对(33 224.49±2 741.00)元;非tpCR:(33 030.05±5 787.00)元对(33 412.50±4 203.00)元,P<0.05]。在早期HER-2阳性乳腺癌的新辅助治疗中,HLX02联合帕妥珠单抗及化疗显示出与曲妥珠单抗原研药相似的疗效和安全性,同时具有显著的成本优势。