Paschke-Dahl Lena, Klinger Regine
Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 4;16:1572761. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572761. eCollection 2025.
Dietary interventions have become a management tool for chronic pain conditions over the past few decades. Certain diets, such as gluten-free diets, are perceived as particularly beneficial by patients, although there is no evidence to support this. Studies that have investigated this topic have focused little on possible expectation effects that could be involved in symptom development or pain increase.
In a 2×2 study design with repeated measurements to test treatment effects, we investigated 26 patients with fibromyalgia (FMS). Additional chronic pain conditions were included and analyzed exploratively. However, the main analysis focused on fibromyalgia patients. Participants underwent an oral food challenge (OFC) with double-blinded gluten or alleged gluten (sham gluten). All of them received an OLP with different instructions to treat negative effects of the porridge. Treatment expectations were modulated by either neutral or positive instructions regarding the OLPs. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups: (1) gluten and neutral instructions; (2) gluten and positive instructions; (3) sham gluten and neutral instructions; and (4) sham gluten and positive instructions. Expectations before (T0) and after the instructions (T0.1) as well as pain and indigestion before (T0) and after the OFC (T1 30min, T2 30-180min, T3 240min) were assessed.
In FMS patients, a significant interaction with instructions were observed ( = 0.048). Positive instructions led to a decrease in pain (T0-T2) while neutral instructions led to an increase in pain. However, comparisons did not reveal significant group differences. No interaction was found with gluten ( = 0.65). Positive instructions increased positive treatment expectations but missed significance marginally ( = 0.06), while negative expectations decreased for all participants regardless of instructions ( < 0.001). A strong correlation was found between expected and actual pain relief ( < 0.001). Digestive discomfort increased temporarily post-intervention ( < 0.004) but returned to baseline after 4 h. No significant effects of gluten ( = 0.15) or instructions ( = 0.8) on indigestion were observed.
This study highlights the complex interplay of disease type, placebo effects, and expectations in chronic pain conditions during gluten provocation. While gluten itself showed no significant impact on pain or indigestion, positive instructions significantly enhanced perceived pain relief. These findings suggest that expectation effects, rather than gluten, may play a more central role in symptom modulation, at least for pain. Future research should focus on expectation-driven mechanisms to better understand and optimize dietary interventions in chronic pain management and differences across pain diseases.
在过去几十年中,饮食干预已成为慢性疼痛疾病的一种管理工具。某些饮食,如无麸质饮食,患者认为特别有益,尽管没有证据支持这一点。研究该主题的研究很少关注可能参与症状发展或疼痛加剧的期望效应。
在一项采用重复测量的2×2研究设计以测试治疗效果的研究中,我们调查了26名纤维肌痛(FMS)患者。纳入了其他慢性疼痛疾病并进行了探索性分析。然而,主要分析集中在纤维肌痛患者身上。参与者接受了双盲的麸质或所谓的麸质(假麸质)口服食物激发试验(OFC)。他们所有人都接受了具有不同指示的口服补液(OLP)以治疗粥的不良反应。通过关于OLP的中性或积极指示来调节治疗期望。参与者被随机分配到四组之一:(1)麸质和中性指示;(2)麸质和积极指示;(3)假麸质和中性指示;以及(4)假麸质和积极指示。评估了指示前(T0)和指示后(T0.1)的期望以及OFC前(T0)和后(T1 30分钟,T2 30 - 180分钟,T3 240分钟)的疼痛和消化不良情况。
在FMS患者中,观察到与指示有显著交互作用(= 0.048)。积极指示导致疼痛减轻(T0 - T2),而中性指示导致疼痛增加。然而,组间比较未发现显著差异。未发现与麸质有交互作用(= 0.65)。积极指示增加了积极治疗期望,但略未达到显著水平(= 0.06),而无论指示如何所有参与者的消极期望都降低了(< 0.001)。发现预期和实际疼痛缓解之间存在强烈相关性(< 0.001)。干预后消化不适暂时增加(< 0.004),但4小时后恢复到基线水平。未观察到麸质(= 0.15)或指示(= 0.8)对消化不良有显著影响。
本研究强调了在麸质激发期间慢性疼痛疾病中疾病类型、安慰剂效应和期望之间复杂的相互作用。虽然麸质本身对疼痛或消化不良没有显著影响,但积极指示显著增强了感知到的疼痛缓解。这些发现表明,至少对于疼痛而言,期望效应而非麸质可能在症状调节中发挥更核心的作用。未来的研究应关注期望驱动的机制,以更好地理解和优化慢性疼痛管理中的饮食干预以及不同疼痛疾病之间的差异。