James Aubrie R M, Mayfield Margaret M, Bimler Malyon D
Department of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
School of Biology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Ecol Lett. 2025 Jun;28(6):e70150. doi: 10.1111/ele.70150.
Species interactions are foundational to biodiversity maintenance. Facilitation, a common outcome of species interactions, occurs among and between a wide variety of organisms yet its treatment in the theory and models used to predict species coexistence is underdeveloped. We ask why this is and speculate about how to address this apparent discrepancy. We first evaluate a persistent ambivalence to facilitation in the context of population and community ecology, particularly in contemporary coexistence theory. We then propose 'facilitation thinking' to remedy the gap between empirical evidence of facilitation and mathematical theory of coexistence. We briefly discuss how a holistic treatment of facilitation in theory has the potential to reconfigure our basic understanding and definition of coexistence. Ultimately, we argue for an expanded theory of coexistence that accounts for a diversity of species interaction outcomes, allowing for the study of interactions and diversity maintenance beyond the war of all against all.
物种间相互作用是生物多样性维持的基础。促进作用作为物种间相互作用的常见结果,发生在各种各样的生物体之间及内部,但在用于预测物种共存的理论和模型中,对其的探讨尚不完善。我们探究其原因,并推测如何解决这一明显的差异。我们首先在种群和群落生态学背景下,尤其是在当代共存理论中,评估对促进作用一直存在的矛盾态度。然后我们提出“促进作用思维”,以弥补促进作用的实证证据与共存数学理论之间的差距。我们简要讨论了在理论上对促进作用进行全面探讨如何有可能重新构建我们对共存的基本理解和定义。最终,我们主张建立一个更广泛的共存理论,该理论考虑到物种相互作用结果的多样性,从而能够研究超越“一切人反对一切人”的战争之外的相互作用和多样性维持。