Fehrenbach Uli, Hosse Clarissa, Wienbrandt William, Walter-Rittel Thula, Kolck Johannes, Auer Timo Alexander, Blüthner Elisabeth, Tacke Frank, Beetz Nick Lasse, Geisel Dominik
Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany.
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, Berlin, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11746-3.
Body composition analysis (BCA) is a recognized indicator of patient frailty. Apart from the established bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), computed tomography (CT)-derived BCA is being increasingly explored. The aim of this prospective study was to directly compare BCA obtained from BIA and CT.
A total of 210 consecutive patients scheduled for CT, including a high proportion of cancer patients, were prospectively enrolled. Immediately prior to the CT scan, all patients underwent BIA. CT-based BCA was performed using a single-slice AI tool for automated detection and segmentation at the level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3). BIA-based parameters, body fat mass (BFM) and skeletal muscle mass (SMM), CT-based parameters, subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue area (SATA and VATA) and total abdominal muscle area (TAMA) were determined. Indices were calculated by normalizing the BIA and CT parameters to patient's weight (body fat percentage (BFP) and body fat index (BFI)) or height (skeletal muscle index (SMI) and lumbar skeletal muscle index (LSMI)).
Parameters representing fat, BFM and SATA + VATA, and parameters representing muscle tissue, SMM and TAMA, showed strong correlations in female (fat: r = 0.95; muscle: r = 0.72; p < 0.001) and male (fat: r = 0.91; muscle: r = 0.71; p < 0.001) patients. Linear regression analysis was statistically significant (fat: R = 0.73 (female) and 0.74 (male); muscle: R = 0.56 (female) and 0.56 (male); p < 0.001), showing that BFI and LSMI allowed prediction of BFP and SMI for both sexes.
CT-based BCA strongly correlates with BIA results and yields quantitative results for BFP and SMI comparable to the existing gold standard.
Question CT-based body composition analysis (BCA) is moving more and more into clinical focus, but validation against established methods is lacking. Findings Fully automated CT-based BCA correlates very strongly with guideline-accepted bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Clinical relevance BCA is currently moving further into clinical focus to improve assessment of patient frailty and individualize therapies accordingly. Comparability with established BIA strengthens the value of CT-based BCA and supports its translation into clinical routine.
身体成分分析(BCA)是公认的患者虚弱指标。除了已有的生物电阻抗分析(BIA)外,基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的BCA也在不断探索中。本前瞻性研究的目的是直接比较通过BIA和CT获得的BCA。
前瞻性纳入了连续210例计划进行CT检查的患者,其中癌症患者比例较高。在CT扫描前,所有患者均接受BIA检查。基于CT的BCA使用单层面人工智能工具在第三腰椎(L3)水平进行自动检测和分割。测定基于BIA的参数,即体脂肪量(BFM)和骨骼肌量(SMM),以及基于CT的参数,即皮下和内脏脂肪组织面积(SATA和VATA)和腹部肌肉总面积(TAMA)。通过将BIA和CT参数标准化为患者体重(体脂百分比(BFP)和体脂指数(BFI))或身高(骨骼肌指数(SMI)和腰椎骨骼肌指数(LSMI))来计算指数。
代表脂肪的参数BFM和SATA + VATA,以及代表肌肉组织的参数SMM和TAMA,在女性(脂肪:r = 0.95;肌肉:r = 0.72;p < 0.001)和男性(脂肪:r = 0.91;肌肉:r = 0.71;p < 0.001)患者中显示出强相关性。线性回归分析具有统计学意义(脂肪:R = 0.73(女性)和0.74(男性);肌肉:R = 0.56(女性)和0.56(男性);p < 0.001),表明BFI和LSMI可用于预测两性的BFP和SMI。
基于CT的BCA与BIA结果高度相关,并能得出与现有金标准相当的BFP和SMI定量结果。
问题 基于CT的身体成分分析(BCA)越来越受到临床关注,但缺乏与现有方法的验证。发现 全自动基于CT的BCA与指南认可的生物电阻抗分析(BIA)高度相关。临床意义 BCA目前正进一步进入临床关注领域,以改善对患者虚弱的评估并相应地实现治疗个体化。与现有BIA的可比性增强了基于CT的BCA的价值,并支持其转化为临床常规应用。