• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对胎儿染色体失衡的全基因组游离DNA筛查的偏好与理解:一项调查研究。

Patient Preferences and Understanding of Genome-Wide Cell-Free DNA Screening for Foetal Chromosomal Imbalances: A Survey Study.

作者信息

Raymond Yvette, Fernando Shavi, Mol Ben W, Menezes Melody, McLennan Andrew, Meagher Simon, Hill Amy, Rolnik Daniel L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.

Monash Women's, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia.

出版信息

Prenat Diagn. 2025 Jul;45(8):994-1003. doi: 10.1002/pd.6842. Epub 2025 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1002/pd.6842
PMID:40537289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12254435/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess parental preferences, expectations and understanding of genome-wide cell-free DNA screening (gwNIPT) in Australia.

METHOD

A cross-sectional survey study utilizing an anonymous electronic questionnaire was conducted across three participating screening services in Australia between September 2023 and November 2024. Questions pertained to respondent demographics, pre-screening counselling, and accuracy expectations of gwNIPT for various chromosomal anomalies. Statistical analyses to investigate associations between responses used Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests, ordinal logistic regression, and the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

There were 329 survey responses recorded, of which 216 were completed (65.7%). The most frequent source of NIPT referral was a medical doctor (74.1%), and the most common duration of pre-screening counselling was 5 minutes (41.0%). Respondents showed overwhelming interest in all anomalies included in gwNIPT as well as various phenotypic outcomes including those of uncertain clinical significance. Despite this, only a minority of patients were aware that they were undergoing genome-wide screening (38.2%), and respondents did not anticipate a statistically significant difference in screening accuracy across different anomaly types (p = 0.715).

CONCLUSION

Respondents undergoing gwNIPT indicated a preference to receive as much genetic information about their pregnancies as possible. Pre-screening counselling should therefore include the limitations of gwNIPT.

摘要

目的

评估澳大利亚父母对全基因组游离DNA筛查(gwNIPT)的偏好、期望和理解。

方法

2023年9月至2024年11月期间,在澳大利亚的三家参与筛查服务机构开展了一项横断面调查研究,采用匿名电子问卷。问题涉及受访者人口统计学信息、筛查前咨询以及对gwNIPT针对各种染色体异常的准确性期望。使用卡方检验、费舍尔精确检验、有序逻辑回归和克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验对调查结果之间的关联进行统计分析。

结果

共记录了329份调查问卷回复,其中216份填写完整(65.7%)。NIPT转诊的最常见来源是医生(74.1%),筛查前咨询的最常见时长为5分钟(41.0%)。受访者对gwNIPT涵盖的所有异常以及各种表型结果(包括临床意义不确定的结果)表现出极大兴趣。尽管如此,只有少数患者意识到他们正在接受全基因组筛查(38.2%),且受访者预计不同异常类型的筛查准确性在统计学上无显著差异(p = 0.715)。

结论

接受gwNIPT的受访者表示倾向于获取尽可能多的关于其妊娠的遗传信息。因此,筛查前咨询应包括gwNIPT的局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12254435/8e3fa1ce38d6/PD-45-994-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12254435/24a9dd2ff356/PD-45-994-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12254435/a155555b857a/PD-45-994-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12254435/8e3fa1ce38d6/PD-45-994-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12254435/24a9dd2ff356/PD-45-994-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12254435/a155555b857a/PD-45-994-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adaf/12254435/8e3fa1ce38d6/PD-45-994-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient Preferences and Understanding of Genome-Wide Cell-Free DNA Screening for Foetal Chromosomal Imbalances: A Survey Study.患者对胎儿染色体失衡的全基因组游离DNA筛查的偏好与理解:一项调查研究。
Prenat Diagn. 2025 Jul;45(8):994-1003. doi: 10.1002/pd.6842. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
2
Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.基于基因组学的非侵入性产前检测用于检测孕妇胎儿染色体非整倍体。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 10;11(11):CD011767. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011767.pub2.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
First trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.孕早期唐氏综合征筛查的血清学检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 30;2015(11):CD011975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011975.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
A Shadow of Doubt: Is There Implicit Bias Among Orthopaedic Surgery Faculty and Residents Regarding Race and Gender?疑虑重重:骨科手术教员和住院医师在种族和性别方面是否存在隐性偏见?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1145-1155. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002933. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
7
Community screening for visual impairment in older people.老年人视力障碍的社区筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 20;2(2):CD001054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001054.pub3.
8
[Prenatal diagnosis and analysis of fetuses with false-positive NIPT results caused by sex chromosomal abnormalities in pregnant women].[孕妇性染色体异常导致无创产前基因检测结果假阳性胎儿的产前诊断与分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2025 May 10;42(5):525-531. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20250127-00053.
9
First trimester ultrasound tests alone or in combination with first trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening.孕早期单独进行超声检查或与孕早期血清检查联合用于唐氏综合征筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 15;3(3):CD012600. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012600.
10
Racial and ethnic disparities in non-invasive prenatal testing adherence: a retrospective cohort study.非侵入性产前检测依从性方面的种族和民族差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jul 2. doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05530-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Disparities in integrating non-invasive prenatal testing into antenatal healthcare in Australia: a survey of healthcare professionals.澳大利亚将无创产前检测纳入产前保健中的差异:对医疗保健专业人员的调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 May 14;24(1):355. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06565-1.
2
Psychological impact of additional findings detected by genome-wide Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): TRIDENT-2 study.全基因组无创产前检测(NIPT)发现的额外结果的心理影响:TRIDENT-2研究
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Mar;32(3):302-308. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01504-8. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3
Patient attitudes and preferences about expanded noninvasive prenatal testing.
患者对扩展的非侵入性产前检测的态度和偏好。
Front Genet. 2023 Apr 18;14:976051. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.976051. eCollection 2023.
4
Western Australian women's expectations for expanded NIPT-An online survey regarding NIPT for single gene, recessive and chromosomal conditions.西澳大利亚州女性对扩大无创产前检测的期望——一项关于针对单基因、隐性和染色体疾病的无创产前检测的在线调查
J Genet Couns. 2023 Oct;32(5):1047-1056. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1715. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
5
The accuracy of cell-free DNA screening for fetal segmental copy number variants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.游离DNA筛查胎儿节段性拷贝数变异的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2023 May;130(6):549-559. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17386. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
6
The accuracy of prenatal cell-free DNA screening for sex chromosome abnormalities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.产前游离DNA筛查性染色体异常的准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Mar;5(3):100844. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100844. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
7
Experiences of pregnant women with genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing in a national screening program.在国家筛查计划中接受全基因组无创产前检测的孕妇的体验。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 May;31(5):555-561. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01248-x. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
8
Cell-free DNA screening for rare autosomal trisomies and segmental chromosome imbalances.游离胎儿 DNA 筛查罕见常染色体三体及部分染色体微缺失微重复综合征
Prenat Diagn. 2022 Oct;42(11):1349-1357. doi: 10.1002/pd.6233. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
9
The predictive value of prenatal cell-free DNA testing for rare autosomal trisomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.产前游离胎儿 DNA 检测对罕见常染色体三体的预测价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;228(3):292-305.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.034. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
10
Whole genome non-invasive prenatal testing in prenatal screening algorithm: clinical experience from 12,700 pregnancies.全基因组非侵入性产前检测在产前筛查算法中的应用:来自 12700 例妊娠的临床经验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Aug 9;22(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04966-8.