Isenberg Erin E, Sinamo Joshua, Rubyan Michael A, Ehlers Annie, Telem Dana A
Department of Surgery, University of Texas at Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
National Clinician Scholars Program, Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, North Campus Research Complex Building 16, 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11914-y.
Patients undergoing recurrent emergent hernia repairs may represent some of the most vulnerable patients in the healthcare system. However, this population has not been adequately characterized to date, limiting identification of opportunities for intervention.
We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of Medicare beneficiaries who underwent an index emergent or urgent ventral hernia repair between 2011 and 2021. We performed a multivariable risk-adjusted Royston-Parmar survival analysis for cumulative recurrent emergent hernia repair incidence within 10 years, accounting for patient comorbidities, demographics, and repair characteristics. We assessed patient, provider, and community factors associated with an increased risk of recurrent emergent hernia repair. We used the Social Vulnerability Index, a publicly available score from the CDC reflecting 15 sociodemographic factors, to measure social risk.
Among 120,227 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent emergent hernia repair during the study period, the mean (SD) age was 71 (12) and 58% were female. At 10 years, the cumulative incidence of recurrent emergent hernia repair was 6.4% (95% CI 6.2-6.7). Median time to recurrent repair was 1.6 years [IQR 0.8-3.2]. Risk-adjusted factors associated with increased risk for recurrent emergent repair include female sex (10-year Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.58, 95% CI [1.24-2.02]), Hispanic ethnicity (10-year HR 1.19, 95% CI [1.01-1.41]), and patients in the highest quintile of social vulnerability (10-year HR 1.33, 95% CI [1.03-1.71]). Hernias repaired via open approach (10-year HR 1.44, 95% CI [1.03- 2.01) and at for-profit hospitals (10-year HR 1.16, 95% CI [1.06-1.26]) also experienced increased risk.
Female, Hispanic, and socially vulnerable patients are at increased risk of recurrent emergent hernia repairs, as well as patients receiving an open index repair and care at for-profit hospitals. Our study highlights opportunities for intervention, including consideration of index repair approach and populations that may benefit from closer follow-up and earlier elective intervention for hernia recurrence.
接受复发性急诊疝修补术的患者可能是医疗系统中最脆弱的患者群体之一。然而,迄今为止,这一群体尚未得到充分的特征描述,限制了干预机会的识别。
我们对2011年至2021年间接受首次急诊或紧急腹疝修补术的医疗保险受益人进行了一项回顾性横断面研究。我们对10年内复发性急诊疝修补术的累积发生率进行了多变量风险调整的罗伊斯顿-帕玛生存分析,同时考虑了患者的合并症、人口统计学特征和修补特征。我们评估了与复发性急诊疝修补术风险增加相关的患者、提供者和社区因素。我们使用社会脆弱性指数(一种来自疾病控制与预防中心的公开可用评分,反映15个社会人口学因素)来衡量社会风险。
在研究期间接受急诊疝修补术的120,227名医疗保险受益人中,平均(标准差)年龄为71岁(12岁),58%为女性。10年后,复发性急诊疝修补术的累积发生率为6.4%(95%置信区间6.2 - 6.7)。再次修补的中位时间为1.6年[四分位间距0.8 - 3.2]。与复发性急诊修补术风险增加相关的风险调整因素包括女性(10年风险比[HR] 1.58,95%置信区间[1.24 - 2.02])、西班牙裔(10年HR 1.19,95%置信区间[1.01 - 1.41])以及社会脆弱性最高五分位数的患者(10年HR 1.33,95%置信区间[1.03 - 1.71])。通过开放手术方式修补的疝(10年HR 1.44,95%置信区间[1.03 - 2.01])以及在营利性医院接受治疗的患者(10年HR 1.16,95%置信区间[1.06 - 1.26])风险也增加。
女性、西班牙裔和社会脆弱的患者复发性急诊疝修补术的风险增加,接受开放首次修补术的患者以及在营利性医院接受治疗的患者也是如此。我们的研究突出了干预机会,包括考虑首次修补方法以及可能从更密切随访和更早的疝复发择期干预中受益的人群。