Ciudin Andreea, Johansson Erin, Zimner-Rapuch Sarah, Dimitriadis Georgios K, Bertrand Marine, Curteis Tristan, Clark Laura J, Fan Ludi, Sapin Helene, Bergmann Jean-Francois
Endocrinology and Nutrition, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jun 19. doi: 10.1111/dom.16508.
AIMS: This indirect treatment comparison (ITC) compared the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide with semaglutide for managing obesity or overweight in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D), informed by the pivotal trials SURMOUNT-2 and STEP 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants had body mass index (BMI) ≥ 27 kg/m, with ≥1 unsuccessful prior dietary weight reduction effort and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7%-10% on stable therapy. A heterogeneity assessment confirmed that study and patient baseline characteristics were similar. Bucher ITCs compared tirzepatide 10 and 15 mg once-weekly (QW) to semaglutide 2.4 mg QW via placebo, all adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity. RESULTS: Tirzepatide 10 and 15 mg were associated with statistically significant greater reductions in weight, BMI and HbA1c versus semaglutide. Tirzepatide 15 mg was associated with statistically significant greater odds versus semaglutide of ≥5% and ≥15% weight reduction and statistically significant improvements in several cardiometabolic risk factors, including waist circumference, fasting plasma glucose and triglycerides. Both tirzepatide doses showed non-significant trends of greater improvements in high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure versus semaglutide as well as a generally comparable safety profile to semaglutide. CONCLUSIONS: In this ITC versus semaglutide 2.4 mg, tirzepatide 10 and 15 mg were associated with statistically significant greater weight, BMI and HbA1c reduction and tirzepatide 15 mg with statistically significant improvements in multiple cardiometabolic risk factors crucial in managing obesity or overweight among patients with T2D. Both tirzepatide doses also had a generally similar safety profile to semaglutide. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: What is the context and purpose of this research study? Excess weight and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are strongly connected, where most patients with T2D have obesity or overweight. Weight management is crucial for improving T2D outcomes and preventing its progression. Weight management comprises behavioural interventions, psychological support, dietary changes and physical activity programmes. Medications may also be prescribed or surgical options may also be considered. Two such medications for weight management are tirzepatide (up to 15 mg) and semaglutide (up to 2.4 mg), which are injected subcutaneously once per week to help control appetite by prolonging patients' feeling of fullness. These medications are also used at different doses to treat T2D. Because there were no clinical trials directly comparing tirzepatide and semaglutide, particularly in patients with both T2D and either obesity or overweight, this study aimed to indirectly compare the effectiveness and safety of tirzepatide and semaglutide for weight management in patients with overweight or obesity and T2D. What was done? We indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of two doses of tirzepatide (10 and 15 mg per week) versus semaglutide 2.4 mg per week for weight management in adults with both T2D and either obesity or overweight. We used data from two large clinical trials, SURMOUNT-2 and STEP 2, which tested tirzepatide and semaglutide, respectively, against a placebo, all adjunct to diet and exercise. An indirect treatment comparison of tirzepatide and semaglutide was then possible via the placebo arm acting as the common comparator. The similarity of study design and patient populations in the two trials was evaluated and found to be sufficiently close to allow meaningful comparisons. Appropriate statistical methodology was used to facilitate comparisons of the two trials. What were the main results? Compared to semaglutide 2.4 mg, the higher dose of tirzepatide (15 mg) was associated with a statistically significant improvement in several outcomes such as weight reduction, glycaemic outcomes and triglycerides, while the lower dose of tirzepatide (10 mg) was associated with some statistically significant improvements (e.g., weight reduction and HbA1c) and had otherwise comparable outcomes to semaglutide. However, both doses of tirzepatide were associated with statistically significant greater reductions in glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) compared to semaglutide, which is a key target of T2D treatment. Both doses of tirzepatide had a generally similar safety profile compared to semaglutide. What is the originality and relevance of this study? Currently, there are no clinical trials that compare tirzepatide and semaglutide directly for the management of obesity and overweight in patients with T2D. Previous studies have compared tirzepatide and semaglutide results from different clinical trials for weight management in patients without T2D, not specifically focusing on patients with T2D. This is the first study to indirectly compare tirzepatide and semaglutide for weight management in people with T2D who also have obesity or overweight. The findings of this study suggest that higher doses of tirzepatide may be more effective than semaglutide for weight reduction and improving other health-related outcomes in these patients.
目的:这项间接治疗比较(ITC)研究,在关键试验SURMOUNT - 2和STEP 2的基础上,比较替尔泊肽与司美格鲁肽治疗2型糖尿病(T2D)患者肥胖或超重的疗效和安全性。 材料与方法:参与者体重指数(BMI)≥27kg/m²,既往有≥1次饮食减重未成功经历,且在稳定治疗下糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)为7% - 10%。异质性评估证实研究和患者基线特征相似。Bucher间接治疗比较将每周一次(QW)皮下注射10mg和15mg替尔泊肽,通过安慰剂对照,与每周一次皮下注射2.4mg司美格鲁肽进行比较,所有治疗均辅助低热量饮食和增加体力活动。 结果:与司美格鲁肽相比,10mg和15mg替尔泊肽在体重、BMI和HbA1c降低方面具有统计学显著差异。15mg替尔泊肽与司美格鲁肽相比,体重降低≥5%和≥15%的几率具有统计学显著差异,并且在包括腰围、空腹血糖和甘油三酯在内 的多个心血管代谢危险因素方面有统计学显著改善。两种替尔泊肽剂量在高密度脂蛋白、低密度脂蛋白、收缩压和舒张压改善方面与司美格鲁肽相比均有不显著的更大改善趋势,并且安全性概况与司美格鲁肽总体相当。 结论:在这项与2.4mg司美格鲁肽的间接治疗比较中,10mg和15mg替尔泊肽在体重、BMI和HbA1c降低方面具有统计学显著差异,15mg替尔泊肽在多个对T2D患者肥胖或超重管理至关重要的心血管代谢危险因素方面有统计学显著改善。两种替尔泊肽剂量的安全性概况也与司美格鲁肽总体相似。 通俗易懂的总结:本研究的背景和目的是什么?超重与2型糖尿病(T2D)紧密相关,大多数T2D患者存在肥胖或超重。体重管理对于改善T2D结局和预防其进展至关重要。体重管理包括行为干预、心理支持、饮食改变和体育活动计划。也可能会开药物处方或考虑手术选择。两种用于体重管理的药物是替尔泊肽(最高15mg)和司美格鲁肽(最高2.4mg),它们每周皮下注射一次,通过延长患者饱腹感来帮助控制食欲。这些药物也以不同剂量用于治疗T2D。由于没有直接比较替尔泊肽和司美格鲁肽的临床试验,特别是在同时患有T2D和肥胖或超重的患者中,本研究旨在间接比较替尔泊肽和司美格鲁肽对超重或肥胖且患有T2D患者体重管理的有效性和安全性。做了什么?我们间接比较了两剂量替尔泊肽(每周10mg和15mg)与每周2.4mg司美格鲁肽对同时患有T2D和肥胖或超重成年人的体重管理效果和安全性。我们使用了两项大型临床试验SURMOUNT - 2和STEP 2的数据,这两项试验分别将替尔泊肽和司美格鲁肽与安慰剂进行对照,所有治疗均辅助饮食和运动。然后通过作为共同对照的安慰剂组对替尔泊肽和司美格鲁肽进行间接治疗比较。评估了两项试验的研究设计和患者群体的相似性,发现足够接近以进行有意义的比较。使用适当的统计方法来促进两项试验的比较。主要结果是什么?与2.4mg司美格鲁肽相比,较高剂量的替尔泊肽(15mg)在体重减轻、血糖结果和甘油三酯等多个结果方面有统计学显著改善,而较低剂量的替尔泊肽(10mg)有一些统计学显著改善(如体重减轻和HbA1c),其他方面与司美格鲁肽结果相当。然而,与司美格鲁肽相比,两种剂量的替尔泊肽在糖化血红蛋白A1c(HbA1c)降低方面均有统计学显著差异,而HbA1c是T2D治疗的关键靶点。与司美格鲁肽相比,两种剂量的替尔泊肽安全性概况总体相似。本研究的创新性和相关性是什么?目前,尚无直接比较替尔泊肽和司美格鲁肽治疗T2D患者肥胖和超重的临床试验。以前的研究比较了替尔泊肽和司美格鲁肽在不同临床试验中对无T2D患者体重管理的结果,并非专门针对T2D患者。这是第一项间接比较替尔泊肽和司美格鲁肽对同时患有肥胖或超重的T2D患者体重管理的研究。本研究结果表明,较高剂量的替尔泊肽在这些患者的体重减轻和改善其他健康相关结局方面可能比司美格鲁肽更有效。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024-7-8
N Engl J Med. 2025-7-3
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
N Engl J Med. 2025-3-6
N Engl J Med. 2025-7-3
JAMA Intern Med. 2024-9-1
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023