Srivastava Vinod K, Singh Adarsh K, Mishra Neel K, Prabha Rati, Raman Rajesh, Singh Vinita, Singh Shailendra
Anesthesiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Orthopedic Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Cureus. 2025 May 20;17(5):e84453. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84453. eCollection 2025 May.
Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) can be achieved using suprainguinal (SFICB) or infrainguinal (IFICB) approaches. This study compares postoperative analgesia of SFICB and IFICB after total knee replacement (TKR).
This prospective, randomized, single-blind study was conducted on 60 adult patients undergoing unilateral TKR under spinal anesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group S received SFICB with 30 mL of 0.25% levobupivacaine with 2 mL (8 mg) dexamethasone, while Group I received IFICB with the same drugs after surgery. The primary outcome variable was 24-hour cumulative tramadol consumption. Secondary outcome variables included pain intensity, complications, hemodynamic variations, and time to first rescue analgesic request.
Tramadol consumption was significantly lower with SFICB (86.67±34.57 versus 34.57±33.95 mg, p=0.006). Pain intensity was lower with SFICB after six hours of surgery. Time to first analgesic request was also longer with SFICB (12.83±3.80 versus 10.12±2.98 hours, p=0.003). Time taken for administering the blocks (16.20±2.66 versus 17.17±3.13 minutes), complications, and hemodynamic variations were statistically similar between the groups.
SFICB provides superior postoperative analgesia compared to IFICB in patients undergoing TKR, with reduced opioid requirement and prolonged analgesia duration.
髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB)可通过腹股沟上(SFICB)或腹股沟下(IFICB)入路实现。本研究比较了全膝关节置换术(TKR)后SFICB和IFICB的术后镇痛效果。
本前瞻性、随机、单盲研究纳入了60例在脊髓麻醉下接受单侧TKR的成年患者。患者被随机分为两组:S组在术后接受30 mL含2 mL(8 mg)地塞米松的0.25%左旋布比卡因进行SFICB,而I组在术后接受相同药物进行IFICB。主要结局变量为24小时曲马多累计消耗量。次要结局变量包括疼痛强度、并发症、血流动力学变化以及首次要求救援镇痛的时间。
SFICB的曲马多消耗量显著更低(86.67±34.57对34.57±33.95 mg,p = 0.006)。术后6小时SFICB的疼痛强度更低。SFICB首次要求镇痛的时间也更长(12.83±3.80对10.12±2.98小时,p = 0.003)。两组间实施阻滞的时间(16.20±2.66对17.17±3.13分钟)、并发症及血流动力学变化在统计学上相似。
对于接受TKR的患者,SFICB相比IFICB可提供更优的术后镇痛效果,减少了阿片类药物需求并延长了镇痛持续时间。