Colesie Claudia, Gray Andrew Møller, Walshaw Charlotte V, Bokhorst Stef, Kerby Jeffrey T, Jawak Shridhar, Sancho Leopoldo G, Convey Peter
School of GeoSciences, Global Change Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Terrestrial Ecology Section, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research-NINA, Oslo, Norway.
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Jun;31(6):e70294. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70294.
Earth's polar regions are experiencing significant climate change, impacting global oceanographic and weather patterns. Arctic "greening" is well studied, but a debate has emerged about whether similar trends are occurring in Antarctica and whether and how remote sensing can assess them. Recent studies have introduced a concept of "greening" in Antarctica, framed primarily around moss cover expansion over bare ground. This interpretation differs from Arctic greening studies, which focus mainly on changes in vascular plant productivity and successional dynamics. This paper evaluates the Antarctic greening concept, focusing on how Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)-based methods are applied and interpreted in this context, considering regional limitations in technology, data availability, and the unique Antarctic vegetation characteristics. Unlike the Arctic, Antarctic vegetation consists mainly of nonvascular organisms (algae, cyanobacteria, lichens, and bryophytes) that interact with slow-weathering soils with minimal organic inputs. These biological and environmental differences likely influence NDVI greening metrics and their ecological relevance, but remain poorly understood due to limited long-term data and validation. Despite advances in remote sensing, Antarctic vegetation mapping remains in its early stages. The small size and patchy distribution of vegetation complicate detection of presence and extent, and even with modern satellites, capturing subcentimeter annual growth rates remains challenging. The lack of historical high-resolution imagery hampers change detection, limiting our ability to track habitat expansion, vegetation dynamics, and community composition changes over time. Based on critical assessment, we identify serious concerns regarding the accuracy and interpretation of NDVI-based greening trends in Antarctica in recent studies, particularly in relation to technological constraints and biological realism. To address these issues, we propose a refined framework for interpreting NDVI data in Antarctica, aiming to prevent misleading conclusions about vegetation changes and trends. This framework suggests an urgent need for re-evaluation of how "greening" is both quantified and interpreted in Antarctica.
地球的极地地区正在经历显著的气候变化,影响着全球海洋学和天气模式。北极“绿化”已得到充分研究,但对于南极洲是否正在出现类似趋势以及遥感能否以及如何评估这些趋势,已经出现了一场争论。最近的研究引入了南极洲“绿化”的概念,主要围绕苔藓在裸地上的覆盖范围扩大。这种解释与北极绿化研究不同,北极绿化研究主要关注维管植物生产力和演替动态的变化。本文评估了南极洲绿化概念,重点关注基于归一化植被指数(NDVI)的方法在这种背景下是如何应用和解释的,同时考虑到技术、数据可用性方面的区域限制以及南极洲独特的植被特征。与北极不同,南极植被主要由非维管生物(藻类、蓝细菌、地衣和苔藓植物)组成,它们与有机输入极少的缓慢风化土壤相互作用。这些生物和环境差异可能会影响NDVI绿化指标及其生态相关性,但由于长期数据和验证有限,人们对此仍知之甚少。尽管遥感技术取得了进展,但南极植被测绘仍处于早期阶段。植被的小规模和零散分布使得检测其存在和范围变得复杂,即使使用现代卫星,捕捉亚厘米级的年生长率仍然具有挑战性。缺乏历史高分辨率图像阻碍了变化检测,限制了我们跟踪栖息地扩张、植被动态以及群落组成随时间变化的能力。基于批判性评估,我们确定了近期研究中关于南极洲基于NDVI的绿化趋势的准确性和解释的严重问题,特别是与技术限制和生物现实性相关的问题。为了解决这些问题,我们提出了一个用于解释南极洲NDVI数据的改进框架,旨在防止对植被变化和趋势得出误导性结论。这个框架表明迫切需要重新评估南极洲“绿化”的量化和解释方式。