• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全机器人受体成人活体肝移植改善短期预后:一项比较研究

Improved Short-Term Outcomes With Fully Robotic Recipient Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Comparative Study.

作者信息

Broering Dieter C, Elsheikh Yasser, Alnemary Yasir, Mahmood Arshad, Majeed Amer, Marcos Amadeo, Alabbad Saleh, Boehnert Markus U, Malago Massimo, Raptis Dimitri A

机构信息

Organ Transplant Center of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Faculty of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006807.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006807
PMID:40539273
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare short-term outcomes between open and fully robotic adult recipient living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

LDLT remains a challenging procedure, traditionally performed using the open approach. Recent advancements in robotic surgery offer potential benefits, including enhanced precision, and reduced invasiveness.

METHODS

This study compared two adult-to-adult recipient LDLT groups: 453 open cases and 54 fully robotic cases. Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors of morbidity, as captured by the Comprehensive Complication Index® (CCI®).

RESULTS

Robotic recipient liver transplantation was associated with lower median blood loss (650 vs. 2,000 ml, P<0.001), shorter ICU (3 vs. 5 d, P<0.001) and hospital stay (14 vs. 20 d, P=0.030), and fewer infection rates (9.3% vs. 42.8%, P<0.001), when compared to open. The CCI® was significantly lower in the robotic group (15.0 vs. 20.9, P=0.045). Graft survival at 6 months was 98.1% in the robotic vs. 91.8% in the open group (P=0.080), while recipient survival was superior in the robotic group (100% vs. 91.8%, P=0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

Fully robotic recipient LDLT is feasible and safe, with potential benefits including reduced morbidity, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stay. These findings support broader adoption of robotic techniques in liver transplantation, pending further cost-effectiveness studies and randomized controlled trials.

摘要

目的

比较开放手术与全机器人辅助成人活体肝移植受者的短期结局。

总结背景数据

活体肝移植仍是一项具有挑战性的手术,传统上采用开放手术方式。机器人手术的最新进展带来了潜在益处,包括更高的精准度和更低的侵袭性。

方法

本研究比较了两个成人对成人受者的活体肝移植组:453例开放手术病例和54例全机器人辅助手术病例。采用多变量线性回归分析来确定由综合并发症指数(CCI®)所反映的发病率的独立预测因素。

结果

与开放手术相比,机器人辅助肝移植受者术中失血量中位数更低(650 vs. 2000 ml,P<0.001),重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间更短(3 vs. 5天,P<0.001),住院时间更短(14 vs. 20天,P=0.030),感染率更低(9.3% vs. 42.8%,P<0.001)。机器人手术组的CCI®显著更低(15.0 vs. 20.9,P=0.045)。机器人手术组6个月时的移植物存活率为98.1%,开放手术组为91.8%(P=0.080),而机器人手术组的受者存活率更高(100% vs. 91.8%,P=0.040)。

结论

全机器人辅助肝移植受者手术可行且安全,潜在益处包括发病率降低、恢复更快和住院时间缩短。这些发现支持在肝移植中更广泛地采用机器人技术,但有待进一步的成本效益研究和随机对照试验。

相似文献

1
Improved Short-Term Outcomes With Fully Robotic Recipient Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Comparative Study.全机器人受体成人活体肝移植改善短期预后:一项比较研究
Ann Surg. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006807.
2
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
3
Clinical outcomes after ABO-incompatible liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.ABO 不相容肝移植后的临床结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transpl Immunol. 2021 Dec;69:101476. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2021.101476. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
4
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
5
Does modification of portal pressure and flow enhance recovery of the recipient after living donor liver transplantation? A systematic review of literature and expert panel recommendations.门静脉压力和血流的改变能否提高活体肝移植受者的恢复情况?一项文献系统综述及专家小组建议。
Clin Transplant. 2022 Oct;36(10):e14657. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14657.
6
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
7
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.腹腔镜及机器人辅助与开放根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2.
8
Effect of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy on postoperative length of hospital stay and complications for pancreatic head or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial.机器人与开腹胰十二指肠切除术对胰头或壶腹周围肿瘤术后住院时间和并发症的影响:一项多中心、开放标签随机对照试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 May;9(5):428-437. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00005-0. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of newer immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplantation: a systematic review and modelling study.肾移植中新型免疫抑制方案的临床疗效与成本效益:一项系统评价与模型研究
Health Technol Assess. 2005 May;9(21):1-179, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9210.