Suppr超能文献

吊床“包裹”位与仰卧位对早产儿和足月儿皮肤氧水平的影响。

The effect of a 'containing' position in a hammock versus the supine position on the cutaneous oxygen level in premature and term babies.

作者信息

Bottos M, Pettenazzo A, Giancola G, Stefani D, Pettena G, Viscolani B, Rubaltelli F F

出版信息

Early Hum Dev. 1985 Sep;11(3-4):265-73. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(85)90080-5.

Abstract

We evaluated the influence of positioning, and particularly a containing position in a hammock compared with the supine position, on the respiration of the newborn. Recordings of the transcutaneous oxygen level of 40 preterm babies and 10 full-term babies placed in their incubators alternately in the two positions have been analyzed. We found no significant differences between the means of the oxymetric indexes in the hammock and in the supine position, even when the babies had different gestational ages and birth weights. The advantages of the containing position for the neuromotor and relational development of the newborn in the first year of life in comparison with the effects of supine placement, which should be avoided as much as possible in the premature, are pointed out.

摘要

我们评估了体位,尤其是与仰卧位相比,新生儿在吊床中的包容体位对其呼吸的影响。对40名早产儿和10名足月儿在两种体位下交替置于保温箱时的经皮氧水平记录进行了分析。我们发现,即使婴儿的胎龄和出生体重不同,吊床体位和仰卧位时血氧测定指标的平均值之间也没有显著差异。文中指出,与仰卧位的影响相比,包容体位对新生儿出生后第一年的神经运动和关系发展具有优势,而早产儿应尽可能避免仰卧位。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验