Bernardin Brooke, Garg Sakshi, Khan Fajr, Lee Yewon, Wade Carrie, Stoklosa Hanni
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Harvard College, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 20;20(6):e0324795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324795. eCollection 2025.
Racial minorities are disproportionately affected by human trafficking, with African Americans making up over 30% of trafficking cases in the United States despite being only 14% of the national population. Health care providers play a crucial role in identifying and supporting survivors of trafficking as roughly two-thirds of individuals who have been trafficked encounter a healthcare professional. However, discrimination against trafficked patients of color in health care, a key setting for frontline service provision, remains unexplored. We undertook a scoping review to identify the effects of racial and ethnic discrimination in the healthcare of individuals who have experienced human trafficking, with the aim of informing anti-racist practice, treatments, interventions, and research. Following the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we identified 41 sources comprising quantitative and qualitative studies, case reports, grey literature, and text and opinion pieces. Quantitative studies indicated that there are significant gaps in service availability for Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) survivors in the midwestern United States. Our remaining sources suggested that healthcare provider bias and discrimination emerged through victim blaming, adultification, criminalization, or invisibility of BIPOC survivors. Racism was also perpetuated structurally through lack of culturally relevant training, fear of punishment from police or immigration enforcement, and sociocultural barriers to accessing healthcare. Furthermore, we identified best practices for future anti-trafficking efforts in health care on several levels including treatment, research, intervention design and evaluation, community partnerships, coalition-building, and political advocacy. Ultimately, healthcare providers have a unique opportunity to respond to human trafficking, but to do so effectively will require comprehensively addressing critical gaps in care for BIPOC populations across individual, interpersonal, and structural levels.
少数族裔在人口贩运中受到的影响尤为严重,尽管非裔美国人仅占美国全国人口的14%,但在美国的人口贩运案件中,他们却占了30%以上。医疗保健提供者在识别和支持人口贩运幸存者方面发挥着关键作用,因为大约三分之二的被贩运者会接触到医疗保健专业人员。然而,在作为一线服务提供关键场所的医疗保健中,对有色人种的被贩运患者的歧视问题仍未得到探讨。我们进行了一项范围审查,以确定种族和族裔歧视对经历过人口贩运的个人在医疗保健方面的影响,目的是为反种族主义实践、治疗、干预措施和研究提供信息。遵循PRISMA扩展版的范围审查(PRISMA-ScR),我们确定了41个来源,包括定量和定性研究、病例报告、灰色文献以及文本和观点文章。定量研究表明,美国中西部地区的黑人、原住民和有色人种(BIPOC)幸存者在服务可及性方面存在重大差距。我们其余的来源表明,医疗保健提供者的偏见和歧视通过指责受害者、将其成人化、定罪或忽视BIPOC幸存者而表现出来。种族主义还通过缺乏与文化相关的培训、对警察或移民执法惩罚的恐惧以及获得医疗保健的社会文化障碍在结构上得以延续。此外,我们确定了未来在医疗保健领域开展反人口贩运工作的几个层面的最佳做法,包括治疗、研究、干预设计与评估、社区伙伴关系、联盟建设和政治宣传。最终,医疗保健提供者有一个应对人口贩运的独特机会,但要有效做到这一点,将需要在个人、人际和结构层面全面解决BIPOC人群护理方面的关键差距。