Martins L F, Cueva S F, Wasson D E, Almeida C V, Richards A T, Stepanchenko N, Hristov A N
Department of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
Department of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.
J Dairy Sci. 2025 Jul;108(7):7109-7126. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-26140.
The objective was to investigate the effects of separate feeding of a partial mixed ration (PMR) and concentrate premixes (CMix) delivered at fixed or variable amounts using an automatic feeding system (AFS) on lactational performance, enteric CH emissions, ruminal fermentation variables, digestibility of nutrients, and N excretion in lactating dairy cows. Forty-eight primi- and multiparous Holstein cows averaging 91 ± 26 DIM were enrolled in a 17-wk randomized complete block design experiment, with a 2-wk covariate, 5-wk adaptation, and 10-wk data and sample collection periods. Cows were blocked based on parity, DIM, and ECM. Cows within blocks were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments: (1) CON = diet fed ad libitum as a TMR; (2) SF = diet fed as separate feeds (SF) with ad libitum PMR and fixed amounts of CMix via an AFS; and (3) SF = SF with variable amounts of CMix calculated by an algorithm derived based on balances of NEL and MP of individual cows and fed via an AFS. Partial mixed ration intake was increased, and milk yield was decreased by SF compared with CON but not with SF. Feed efficiency was decreased by both SF treatments compared with CON. Treatments did not affect ECM yield in the current study. Enteric gas emissions were not affected by SF, but CH intensity tended to be increased by 10% in SF compared with CON. The concentration of ruminal VFA and VFA profile were not affected, except for an increase in butyrate concentration by both SF treatments and a tendency for increased ammonia concentration in SF compared with CON. Apparent DM and OM digestibility was increased by SF, whereas amylase-treated NDF and ADF digestibility was increased by both SF and SF. Treatments did not affect N excretion or secretion variables, except that urine N excretion (as % of N intake) was decreased by SF compared with CON. Total purine derivative excretion tended to be decreased by SF compared with CON but not by SF Overall, SF did not affect lactational performance but decreased urinary N excretion compared with feeding a TMR. Feeding variable amounts of CMix calculated using an algorithm based on individual NEL and MP balances (i.e., SF) had a negative effect on lactational performance and CH intensity, likely because of algorithm overfitting and lack of generalization.
本研究旨在探讨使用自动饲喂系统(AFS)以固定或可变数量分别饲喂部分混合日粮(PMR)和精料预混料(CMix)对泌乳奶牛的泌乳性能、肠道甲烷排放、瘤胃发酵变量、养分消化率和氮排泄的影响。48头初产和经产荷斯坦奶牛,平均产犊天数为91±26天,参与了一项为期17周的随机完全区组设计实验,包括2周的协变量期、5周的适应期以及10周的数据和样本收集期。奶牛根据胎次、产犊天数和能量校正奶量进行分组。每组内的奶牛被随机分配到3种处理中的一种:(1)CON=自由采食全混合日粮(TMR);(2)SF=通过AFS自由采食PMR并固定量饲喂CMix的单独饲料(SF);(3)SF=通过AFS饲喂根据个体奶牛净能(NEL)和代谢蛋白(MP)平衡推导的算法计算出的可变数量CMix的SF。与CON相比,SF增加了部分混合日粮的摄入量,但降低了产奶量,而两种SF处理之间无差异。与CON相比,两种SF处理均降低了饲料效率。在本研究中,处理对能量校正奶量无影响。肠道气体排放不受SF影响,但与CON相比,SF的甲烷强度有增加10%的趋势。瘤胃挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)浓度和VFA谱不受影响,但两种SF处理均使丁酸浓度增加,且与CON相比,SF的氨浓度有增加的趋势。SF提高了干物质(DM)和有机物(OM)的表观消化率,而淀粉酶处理的中性洗涤纤维(NDF)和酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)消化率在两种SF处理中均有所提高。处理对氮排泄或分泌变量无影响,但与CON相比,SF降低了尿氮排泄(占氮摄入量的百分比)。与CON相比,SF使总嘌呤衍生物排泄有降低的趋势,但SF无此影响。总体而言,与饲喂TMR相比,SF不影响泌乳性能,但降低了尿氮排泄。使用基于个体NEL和MP平衡的算法计算可变数量的CMix(即SF)对泌乳性能和甲烷强度有负面影响,可能是由于算法过度拟合和缺乏通用性。