Hedden Lindsay, Grudniewicz Agnes, Katz Alan, Lavergne M Ruth, McDonald Ted, Rudoler David, Austin Nichole, Halas Gayle, Spencer Sarah, Thelen Rachel, Mathews Maria, McCracken Rita, McGrail Kimberlyn, Shiplett Hugh, Strumpf Erin C
Simon Fraser University Faculty of Health Sciences, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
University of Ottawa Telfer School of Management, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 20;15(6):e103894. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103894.
Amid growing concerns about primary care accessibility and the need to support longitudinal, community-based models of care, Canadian provinces have implemented major reforms to how family physicians are paid. These models share objectives of making longitudinal, community-based family practice more attractive and, to some degree, addressing long-standing disparities in pay between family medicine and other specialties. These new remuneration models require robust evaluation to guide improvements, future investments and planning.
We will conduct a multimethod study to explore physician perceptions and outcomes of these new models. First, we will complete semi-structured interviews with family physicians in British Columbia, Manitoba and Nova Scotia (provinces where a new blended compensation model has been introduced). Interviews will explore family physicians' motivations for moving onto the blended compensation model; how the model has impacted their practice, administrative burden, visit length, capacity, changes to care coordination; and other areas of interest. Second, using provincial and national administrative datasets, we will assess the impact of these payment reforms on service volume, attachment/enrolment, continuity of care, and costs.
We have obtained cross-jurisdictional ethics approvals from Research Ethics British Columbia for the qualitative components and Nova Scotia Health for the quantitative components of this research. Harmonised ethics approvals have been obtained from additional institutions across all study regions. We will create summaries of findings of provincial and cross-provincial analyses and share them with relevant policymakers, physician associations and study participants. Our dissemination will also include traditional publications such as peer-reviewed articles, commentaries/editorials, and academic conferences.
鉴于对初级医疗可及性的担忧日益增加,以及支持纵向、基于社区的医疗模式的必要性,加拿大各省已对家庭医生的薪酬支付方式进行了重大改革。这些模式的共同目标是使纵向、基于社区的家庭医疗更具吸引力,并在一定程度上解决家庭医学与其他专科之间长期存在的薪酬差距。这些新的薪酬模式需要进行有力评估,以指导改进、未来投资和规划。
我们将开展一项多方法研究,以探索医生对这些新模式的看法和结果。首先,我们将对不列颠哥伦比亚省、曼尼托巴省和新斯科舍省(已引入新的混合薪酬模式的省份)的家庭医生进行半结构化访谈。访谈将探讨家庭医生转向混合薪酬模式的动机;该模式如何影响他们的医疗实践、行政负担、诊疗时长、能力、护理协调的变化;以及其他感兴趣的领域。其次,利用省级和国家级行政数据集,我们将评估这些支付改革对服务量、医患关系/注册、护理连续性和成本的影响。
我们已获得不列颠哥伦比亚省研究伦理委员会对本研究定性部分的跨辖区伦理批准,以及新斯科舍省卫生部门对定量部分的批准。已从所有研究地区的其他机构获得协调一致的伦理批准。我们将创建省级和跨省级分析结果的摘要,并与相关政策制定者、医生协会和研究参与者分享。我们的传播还将包括传统出版物,如同行评审文章、评论/社论和学术会议。