Trask Sydney, Brooks Jaden B, Warner Sean
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, United States.
Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, United States.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2025 Jun 18;220:108074. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2025.108074.
Prior work has found that the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) is necessary for formation and retrieval of trace, but not delay, fear conditioning. However, more recently, others have demonstrated that activity in the retrosplenial cortex is necessary for retrieval of a remotely-acquired delay fear memory, suggesting that as memory undergoes systems consolidation it becomes more dependent on neural activity in the RSC. Here, we aimed to examine expression of the immediate early gene zif268 in two distinct subregions of the retrosplenial cortex (anterior and posterior) following retrieval of either a recently-acquired or remotely-acquired delay fear memory. We found that while presenting the conditional stimulus either 1 day or 30 days following delay fear conditioning produced strong conditional responding, activity in either the anterior or posterior RSC assessed through expression of the immediate early gene zif268 was not elevated in the remote retrieval group, contrary to our hypothesis. Instead, activity in the pRSC was elevated in the group that received conditioning the day before. In line with some of our prior work, this suggests that animals in that group were showing neural activity in response to placement in a novel context. We then aimed to determine the circumstances under which delay fear retrieval could produce changes in the anterior RSC, which has been associated with conditional stimulus (CS) encoding and retrieval in a trace fear paradigm. We therefore compared delay and trace conditions to a delay conditioning procedure in which the CS and unconditional stimulus (US) onsets were matched to that of the trace procedure. We found that while both the trace and long-cue delay groups showed a similar behavioral pattern, with freezing that gradually extinguished throughout the 10-CS session, freezing in the standard delay group remained high. When examining zif268 activity, we found that while all three groups showed elevated zif268 expression in the pRSC, only the long-cue delay and trace groups showed increased aRSC activity. Interestingly, only the short-cue delay group showed increased zif268 activity in the basolateral amygdala, corresponding with their elevated fear behavior throughout the session. Together, these results suggest that zif268 activity in the RSC following conditioning is related to the interval between CS onset and US onset.
先前的研究发现,后扣带回皮质(RSC)对于痕迹恐惧条件反射的形成和提取是必需的,但对于延迟恐惧条件反射则不是。然而,最近其他人证明,后扣带回皮质的活动对于远程获得的延迟恐惧记忆的提取是必需的,这表明随着记忆经历系统巩固,它变得更加依赖于RSC中的神经活动。在这里,我们旨在研究在提取最近获得或远程获得的延迟恐惧记忆后,后扣带回皮质两个不同亚区(前部和后部)中即刻早期基因zif268的表达。我们发现,虽然在延迟恐惧条件反射后1天或30天呈现条件刺激会产生强烈的条件反应,但与我们的假设相反,通过即刻早期基因zif268的表达评估的前RSC或后RSC中的活动在远程提取组中并未升高。相反,在前一天接受条件反射的组中,后RSC的活动升高。与我们之前的一些研究一致,这表明该组中的动物在置于新环境中时表现出神经活动。然后,我们旨在确定延迟恐惧提取在何种情况下会在前RSC中产生变化,前RSC与痕迹恐惧范式中的条件刺激(CS)编码和提取有关。因此,我们将延迟和痕迹条件与一种延迟条件反射程序进行了比较,在该程序中,CS和无条件刺激(US)的开始与痕迹程序的开始相匹配。我们发现,虽然痕迹组和长线索延迟组都表现出相似的行为模式,即在整个10次CS试验中冻结逐渐消失,但标准延迟组中的冻结仍然很高。在检查zif268活动时,我们发现虽然所有三组在后RSC中都表现出zif268表达升高,但只有长线索延迟组和痕迹组表现出前RSC活动增加。有趣的是,只有短线索延迟组在基底外侧杏仁核中表现出zif268活动增加,这与它们在整个试验中升高的恐惧行为相对应。总之,这些结果表明,条件反射后RSC中的zif268活动与CS开始和US开始之间的间隔有关。