Suppr超能文献

氯非铵在实验犬模型中的抗心律失常及电生理作用

Antiarrhythmic and electrophysiologic actions of clofilium in experimental canine models.

作者信息

Kopia G A, Eller B T, Patterson E, Shea M J, Lucchesi B R

出版信息

Eur J Pharmacol. 1985 Oct 8;116(1-2):49-61. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(85)90184-0.

Abstract

Clofilium was studied in three experimental models. In non-ischemic and chronically infarcted canine hearts, clofilium (0.5-2 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent increase in electrical ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT), but prolonged the effective refractory period (ERP) of normal myocardium in only the non-ischemic heart. When chronically infarcted hearts were subjected to programmed electrical stimulation, 1 mg/kg of clofilium inhibited the re-induction of either ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in 5 of 6 animals and slowed the rate of the induced tachycardia in the sixth. Clofilium, however, failed to alter ventricular refractory periods of normal myocardium at either twice diastolic threshold current (176 +/- 5 ms control vs. 187 +/- 9 ms post-clofilium, P greater than 0.05) or at 10 mA (134 +/- 6 ms control vs. 137 +/- 13 ms post-clofilium, P greater than 0.05). In addition, chronic administration of clofilium (2 mg/kg, i.v., followed by 1 mg/kg every 12 h) was ineffective in decreasing mortality in a canine model of sudden coronary death. Of 10 saline-treated conscious animals subjected to an electrically-induced intimal lesion of the left circumflex coronary artery in the presence of a previous ischemic insult, all 10 died suddenly of ventricular fibrillation within 173 +/- 45 min after current application. Under similar conditions, 7 clofilium-treated animals died suddenly within 249 +/- 88 min (P greater than 0.05) after current application while 3 animals survived (P greater than 0.10). Clofilium did, however, elevate the effective refractory period in these animals (150 +/- 3 ms saline-treated vs. 195 +/- 7 ms clofilium-treated). It is concluded from our data that there is little relationship between clofilium's electrophysiologic actions in normal myocardium and antiarrhythmic effects. Furthermore, simple prolongation of refractoriness in normal non-ischemic myocardium may be insufficient for the prevention of ventricular fibrillation which develops in response to a transient ischemic event superimposed on a chronically injured myocardium.

摘要

在三种实验模型中对氯菲铵进行了研究。在非缺血和慢性梗死的犬心脏中,氯菲铵(0.5 - 2毫克/千克)使心室电颤动阈值(VFT)呈剂量依赖性增加,但仅在非缺血心脏中延长了正常心肌的有效不应期(ERP)。当对慢性梗死心脏进行程控电刺激时,1毫克/千克的氯菲铵在6只动物中的5只中抑制了室性心动过速或心室颤动的再次诱发,并使第六只动物中诱发的心动过速速率减慢。然而,氯菲铵在两倍舒张阈值电流(对照为176±5毫秒,氯菲铵给药后为187±9毫秒,P>0.05)或10毫安(对照为134±6毫秒,氯菲铵给药后为137±13毫秒,P>0.05)时均未改变正常心肌的心室不应期。此外,在犬冠状动脉猝死模型中,慢性给予氯菲铵(2毫克/千克静脉注射,随后每12小时给予1毫克/千克)在降低死亡率方面无效。在先前存在缺血损伤的情况下,对10只接受盐水处理的清醒动物进行左旋冠状动脉内膜电损伤,所有10只动物在施加电流后173±45分钟内均因心室颤动突然死亡。在类似条件下,7只接受氯菲铵处理的动物在施加电流后249±88分钟内突然死亡(P>0.05),而3只动物存活(P>0.10)。然而,氯菲铵确实提高了这些动物的有效不应期(盐水处理组为150±3毫秒,氯菲铵处理组为195±7毫秒)。从我们的数据得出结论,氯菲铵在正常心肌中的电生理作用与抗心律失常作用之间几乎没有关系。此外,单纯延长正常非缺血心肌的不应期可能不足以预防在慢性损伤心肌上叠加短暂缺血事件时发生的心室颤动。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验