Pizarro Joao, Walker Matthew C, Sheybani Laurent
Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Department of Clinical and Experimental Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Epilepsia. 2025 Jun 21;66(8):e202-10. doi: 10.1111/epi.18509.
Generalized epileptiform discharges (GEDs) in idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) are classically considered symmetrical in amplitude, although this has not been formally tested. This is a major knowledge gap, since asymmetry is conventionally considered an atypical feature, with clinical implications. Furthermore, if such asymmetry exists, it would challenge the concept that IGE engages homogenously the entire brain and rather supports the hypothesis that IGE is shaped by delimited networks. Here, we asked whether GEDs in IGE are asymmetrical and whether this asymmetry exhibits individual specificity. Across 62 patients with IGE recorded with scalp electroencephalography (EEG), we found that GEDs exhibit hemispheric asymmetry (mean, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 22%, 17%-28%) in comparison to control conditions and preceding baseline. Importantly, this asymmetry is systematic across several repetitions of GEDs. Furthermore, the asymmetry varies more across than within patients, indicating that it operates as an individual trait. In contrast, there was no left-right hemispheric preference, and the asymmetry was not different when comparing wake- and sleep-recorded GEDs. Beyond the clinical relevance of providing a formal range for GEDs asymmetry in IGE (upper range of 95% CI ~30% asymmetry), this work supports the concept of IGE as being shaped by distinct and lateralized cortical brain networks.
特发性全身性癫痫(IGE)中的全身性癫痫样放电(GEDs)在振幅上传统上被认为是对称的,尽管这一点尚未经过正式检验。这是一个重大的知识空白,因为不对称性传统上被视为一种非典型特征,具有临床意义。此外,如果这种不对称性存在,它将挑战IGE均匀累及整个大脑的概念,而更支持IGE由限定网络塑造的假说。在此,我们探讨IGE中的GEDs是否不对称,以及这种不对称性是否表现出个体特异性。在62例接受头皮脑电图(EEG)记录的IGE患者中,我们发现与对照条件和先前的基线相比,GEDs表现出半球不对称性(均值,95%置信区间[CI]:22%,17%-28%)。重要的是,这种不对称性在GEDs的多次重复中是系统性的。此外,患者之间的不对称性差异大于患者内部,表明它作为一种个体特征起作用。相比之下,没有左右半球偏好,并且在比较清醒和睡眠记录的GEDs时,不对称性没有差异。除了为IGE中GEDs不对称性提供一个正式范围(95%CI的上限~30%不对称)的临床相关性之外,这项工作支持了IGE由不同的、侧化的皮质脑网络塑造的概念。