Berton M, Sturaro E, Schiavon S, Bittante G, Cecchinato A, Xiccato G, Gallo L
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Padova, Italy.
Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Padova, Italy.
Animal. 2025 May 29;19(7):101562. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2025.101562.
Conventional analyses of the carbon footprint of livestock systems do not consider the relationships between the characteristics and sources of each greenhouse gas (GHGs; CH, NO, CO) and the different livestock systems. This study aimed to assess the carbon footprint of a variety of livestock systems, including different animal categories (dairy cattle, beef cattle, pig and poultry) and production circumstances (lowland and mountain areas). An attributional cradle-to-gate-of-the-farm Life Cycle Assessment was used, considering the emission pattern of each GHG and distinguishing fossil and biogenic origins. The production stages included animal and manure management, on- and off-farm feed production and the production and use of the farm materials. The functional unit was 1 kg of crude protein in animal food (CPAF). Emissions per single GHG and production stage were analysed with a general linear model which included the effect of the livestock system, which proved to significantly influence the emission pattern of all GHGs, both in absolute terms (kg/kg CPAF) and with respect to the single production stage. The CO (fossil-based) resulted as the most emitted GHG (10.2-27.6 kg/kg CPAF), 10-255 and 284-646 times greater than CH and NO, respectively. Methane was found to be more associated with the animal category (ruminants), whereas NO and CO were more associated with the input intensity level. Livestock systems strongly influenced the biogenic GHG emissions but not the fossil-related one, with dairy, pig and poultry systems showing similar and lower values than beef. In conclusion, the evaluation of the pattern of each GHG as well as of their biogenic or fossil origin can give indications to address the reduction of global warming.
传统的畜牧系统碳足迹分析未考虑每种温室气体(GHGs;CH、NO、CO)的特征与来源以及不同畜牧系统之间的关系。本研究旨在评估多种畜牧系统的碳足迹,包括不同动物类别(奶牛、肉牛、猪和家禽)以及生产环境(低地和山区)。采用了从农场摇篮到大门的归因生命周期评估方法,考虑了每种温室气体的排放模式,并区分了化石源和生物源。生产阶段包括动物和粪便管理、农场内外饲料生产以及农场材料的生产和使用。功能单位为动物饲料中1千克粗蛋白(CPAF)。使用通用线性模型分析了每种单一温室气体和生产阶段的排放,该模型包括畜牧系统的影响,结果证明畜牧系统对所有温室气体的排放模式有显著影响,无论是绝对排放量(千克/千克CPAF)还是相对于单个生产阶段而言。基于化石的CO是排放量最高的温室气体(10.2 - 27.6千克/千克CPAF),分别比CH和NO高10 - 255倍和284 - 646倍。发现甲烷与动物类别(反刍动物)的关联更大,而NO和CO与投入强度水平的关联更大。畜牧系统对生物源温室气体排放有强烈影响,但对与化石相关的排放影响不大,奶牛、猪和家禽系统的排放量与肉牛系统相比相似且更低。总之,评估每种温室气体的排放模式及其生物源或化石源可以为减少全球变暖提供指导。