Guamán-Rivera S A, Carrillo Riofrío F M, Jativa-Brito M E, Chuqui-Puma L E, Soldado Soldado G M, Cabezas Andrade L D, Sanchez Quispe H R, Casierra Cardenas A A, Mira Naranjo J M, Santillán Aguirre J P, Congo-Yépez C D
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo - ESPOCH, Sede Orellana, Orellana, Ecuador.
Braz J Biol. 2025 Jun 13;85:e293349. doi: 10.1590/1519-6984.293349. eCollection 2025.
This study evaluates the carbon footprint (CF) of livestock farms in the Orellana Province of the Ecuadorian Amazon, focusing on emissions from enteric fermentation, manure management, and energy use. Utilizing Tier I and Tier II methodologies outlined by the IPCC (2006), the research quantifies greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across three distinct typologies of Agricultural Productive Units (APUs): Conventional Systems (Type 1), Efficient Resource Use (Type 2), and Subsistence and Dependency Systems (Type 3). Results show that the average CF ranged from 14.5 to 18.3 kg CO2-eq per kg of live weight, with enteric fermentation accounting for 60.2% of emissions, followed by manure management (25.4%) and energy use (14.4%). Type 1 farms demonstrated the highest total CF (2.400 kg CO2-eq/farm), primarily due to larger herd sizes (9.8 TLU) and less efficient practices. Type 2 farms, characterized by rotational grazing and improved resource use, showed a reduced CF of 1.860 kg CO2-eq/farm. Type 3 farms, though smaller in scale, exhibited a CF of 1.810 kg CO2-eq/farm, with higher emissions intensity per animal (60.3 kg CO2-eq/animal) compared to Type 1 and 2 (53.2 kg CO2-eq/animal on average). Across all typologies, methane (CH4) from enteric fermentation remains the largest emission source. The findings underscore the critical need for sustainable interventions, such as silvopastoral systems, to mitigate GHG emissions while improving productivity. This research provides baseline data for designing region-specific mitigation strategies, contributing to global efforts to reduce the environmental impact of livestock farming.
本研究评估了厄瓜多尔亚马逊地区奥雷利亚纳省畜牧场的碳足迹(CF),重点关注肠道发酵、粪便管理和能源使用所产生的排放。该研究利用政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC,2006年)概述的一级和二级方法,对三种不同类型的农业生产单位(APU)的温室气体(GHG)排放进行了量化:传统系统(类型1)、高效资源利用系统(类型2)和自给自足与依赖系统(类型3)。结果表明,平均碳足迹为每千克活重14.5至18.3千克二氧化碳当量,其中肠道发酵占排放量的60.2%,其次是粪便管理(25.4%)和能源使用(14.4%)。类型1农场的总碳足迹最高(2400千克二氧化碳当量/农场),主要原因是畜群规模较大(9.8个热带牲畜单位)且做法效率较低。以轮牧和资源利用改善为特征的类型2农场,其碳足迹降至1860千克二氧化碳当量/农场。类型3农场虽然规模较小,但其碳足迹为1810千克二氧化碳当量/农场,与类型1和类型2农场相比,每头动物的排放强度更高(60.3千克二氧化碳当量/动物,而类型1和类型2农场平均为53.2千克二氧化碳当量/动物)。在所有类型中,肠道发酵产生的甲烷(CH₄)仍然是最大的排放源。研究结果强调了采取可持续干预措施(如林牧系统)的迫切需求,以在提高生产力的同时减少温室气体排放。本研究为设计针对该地区的减排策略提供了基线数据,有助于全球为减少畜牧业对环境的影响所做的努力。