Suppr超能文献

斯巴达科学测力板在评估前交叉韧带重建后的恢复情况方面是可靠的。

The Sparta Science force plate is reliable in assessment of recovery following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

作者信息

Wilson W T, Feller J A, Klemm H J, Batty L M, Kirby J C, Webster K E

机构信息

OrthoSport Victoria Research Unit, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Orthopaedics, NHS Ayrshire & Arran, Scotland, United Kingdom.

OrthoSport Victoria Research Unit, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J ISAKOS. 2025 Aug;13:100917. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100917. Epub 2025 Jun 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Sparta Science force plate provides kinetic information derived from movements such as vertical jump and balance tests. It has primarily been utilized to assess fitness amongst athletic and military populations. The outputs from this system may be useful in the assessment of return to sport (RTS) readiness following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of the Sparta Science metrics in ACL reconstruction patients and to compare these results with the healthy population data provided by the Sparta system.

METHODS

Primary ACL reconstruction patients were recruited to undergo testing at 9 months postoperatively, excluding those with a history of ipsilateral or contralateral knee injury, or concomitant multiligament knee injury requiring surgery. Testing included knee laxity assessment, hop tests, isokinetic strength testing using a dynamometer, and then kinetic measures using the Sparta force plate. The force plate assessed double- and single-leg vertical jump and balance tasks, with each test performed twice after a 5-min rest. Metrics analyzed were jump height and Sparta-derived jump profiles and balance scores. Sparta-derived t-scores were used to compare against the population average for each test. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to determine relative reliability.

RESULTS

There were 74 patients, 44 (60%) males, mean age 25(±9) years, with mean pre-injury Marx scale 13.1(±3.4). The Sparta Science metrics showed moderate to excellent reliability for double-leg (ICC: 0.75-0.97) and single-leg vertical jump (ICC: 0.81-0.95), as well as balance assessments (ICC: 0.71-0.81). Patients scored lower than the healthy population norms for vertical jump tests but greater for balance tests. The jump test scores were significantly correlated with hop tests and quadriceps and hamstring strength.

CONCLUSION

The Sparta Science force plate is reliable when assessing patients after ACL reconstruction with ICCs showing moderate to excellent reliability. We identified kinetic deficiencies in vertical jump test performance and the results correlate with other return to sport testing methods. This demonstrates the Sparta system's potential as a reliable option to augment traditional testing methods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

引言

斯巴达科学测力板可提供源自垂直跳跃和平衡测试等运动的动力学信息。它主要用于评估运动员和军人的体能。该系统的输出结果可能有助于评估前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术后恢复运动(RTS)的准备情况。本研究的目的是确定斯巴达科学指标在ACL重建患者中的可靠性,并将这些结果与斯巴达系统提供的健康人群数据进行比较。

方法

招募原发性ACL重建患者在术后9个月进行测试,排除有同侧或对侧膝关节损伤史,或伴有需要手术的多韧带膝关节损伤的患者。测试包括膝关节松弛度评估、单腿跳测试、使用测力计进行等速肌力测试,然后使用斯巴达测力板进行动力学测量。测力板评估双腿和单腿垂直跳跃及平衡任务,每项测试在休息5分钟后进行两次。分析的指标包括跳跃高度、斯巴达衍生的跳跃曲线和平衡分数。使用斯巴达衍生的t分数与每项测试的人群平均值进行比较。计算组内相关系数(ICC)以确定相对可靠性。

结果

共有74例患者,44例(60%)为男性,平均年龄25(±9)岁,受伤前马克思量表平均评分为13.1(±3.4)。斯巴达科学指标在双腿(ICC:0.75 - 0.97)和单腿垂直跳跃(ICC:0.81 - 0.95)以及平衡评估(ICC:0.71 - 0.81)方面显示出中等至极好的可靠性。患者在垂直跳跃测试中的得分低于健康人群标准,但在平衡测试中的得分更高。跳跃测试分数与单腿跳测试以及股四头肌和腘绳肌力量显著相关。

结论

在评估ACL重建术后患者时,斯巴达科学测力板具有可靠性,ICC显示出中等至极好的可靠性。我们发现垂直跳跃测试表现存在动力学缺陷,且结果与其他恢复运动测试方法相关。这表明斯巴达系统作为增强传统测试方法的可靠选择具有潜力。

证据水平

III级

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验