Falagario Ugo Giovanni, Pellegrino Francesco, Björnebo Lars, Abbadi Ahmad, Martini Alberto, Valdman Alexander, Conteduca Vincenza, Carrieri Giuseppe, Gandaglia Giorgio, Briganti Alberto, Montorsi Francesco, Palsdottir Thorgerdur, Eklund Martin, Nordström Tobias, Grönberg Henrik, Aly Markus, Tewari Ash, Akre Olof, Lantz Anna, Wiklund Peter
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (Solna), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Urology and Kidney Transplantation, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 Jun 21. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.05.026.
Biochemical recurrence (BCR) risk stratification guides treatment decisions after primary prostate cancer (PCa) treatment. We evaluated high-risk BCR (HR-BCR) definitions after radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT) and their association with PCa-specific mortality (PCSM).
A population-based cohort study including 17 753 men treated with RP (n = 12 010) or RT (n = 5743) for localized PCa in Stockholm County between 2003 and 2021 was conducted. We assessed the cumulative incidence of any BCR (RP: prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥0.2; RT: PSA ≥nadir + 2), European Association of Urology (EAU) HR-BCR (PSA doubling time ≤1 yr or pathological International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group 4-5 after RP; time to BCR ≤18 mo or biopsy ISUP grade group 4-5 after RT), and EMBARK HR-BCR (PSA doubling time ≤9 mo and PSA >1 ng/ml after RP or PSA ≥nadir + 2 ng/ml after RT). PCSM after HR-BCR was estimated using the competing risk method.
The 10-yr incidence of HR-BCR was 10% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9-11) for EAU HR-BCR and 4% (95% CI: 3-4) for EMBARK HR-BCR after RP, and 10% (95% CI: 9-11) for both definitions after RT. Patients meeting the EMBARK criteria had the highest PCSM (RP: 30%, 95% CI: 24-37; RT: 50%, 95% CI: 45-56). Up to 50% of RP and 31% of RT patients with BCR did not progress to HR-BCR and had lower PCSM.
HR-BCR incidence varies by definition and treatment. The EMBARK criteria identify a smaller subset with the highest PCSM risk. Many patients with BCR never develop HR-BCR. Refining BCR definitions with PSA kinetics and imaging may optimize risk stratification, balancing therapeutic efficacy and overtreatment.
生化复发(BCR)风险分层指导原发性前列腺癌(PCa)治疗后的治疗决策。我们评估了根治性前列腺切除术(RP)或放疗(RT)后高危BCR(HR-BCR)的定义及其与前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)的关联。
开展了一项基于人群的队列研究,纳入2003年至2021年期间在斯德哥尔摩县接受RP(n = 12010)或RT(n = 5743)治疗局限性PCa的17753名男性。我们评估了任何BCR的累积发生率(RP:前列腺特异性抗原[PSA]≥0.2;RT:PSA≥最低点+2)、欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)HR-BCR(RP后PSA倍增时间≤1年或病理国际泌尿病理学会[ISUP]分级组4-5;RT后至BCR的时间≤18个月或活检ISUP分级组4-5)以及EMBARK HR-BCR(RP后PSA倍增时间≤9个月且PSA>1 ng/ml或RT后PSA≥最低点+2 ng/ml)。采用竞争风险法估计HR-BCR后的PCSM。
RP后,EAU HR-BCR的10年HR-BCR发生率为10%(95%置信区间[CI]:9-11),EMBARK HR-BCR为4%(95%CI:3-4);RT后,两种定义的发生率均为10%(95%CI:9-11)。符合EMBARK标准的患者PCSM最高(RP:30%,95%CI:24-37;RT:50%,95%CI:45-56)。高达50%的RP患者和31%的RT BCR患者未进展为HR-BCR,且PCSM较低。
HR-BCR发生率因定义和治疗而异。EMBARK标准识别出PCSM风险最高的较小亚组。许多BCR患者从未发展为HR-BCR。结合PSA动力学和影像学优化BCR定义可能会优化风险分层,平衡治疗效果和过度治疗。