Sureen Sanjay Kumar, Alaswad Faris Dawood, Mohammed Omer Elfaroug Amin, Singhal Vinod Kumar, Bilal Hassan Yousuf
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, PRIME Hospital, Dubai, ARE.
Department of Surgery, Gladstone Hospital, Perth, AUS.
Cureus. 2025 May 23;17(5):e84664. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84664. eCollection 2025 May.
The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of ondansetron and acupressure at pericardium 6 (PC6 or Neiguan) points in managing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
This observational study was conducted in the Department of Orthopedics at Prime Hospital, Dubai, UAE, between 2019 and 2020. Data collection comprised two main components. The first involved recording demographic details, including patients' age, gender, and education level. The second component assessed the severity of nausea and vomiting using a validated visual analog scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no nausea, 1-3 represent mild nausea, 4-7 indicat moderate nausea, and 8-10 reflect severe nausea. Symptom severity and frequency were documented at one, three, and seven hours postoperatively.
The mean age of the acupressure group (Group A) was 38.92 ± 12.11 years, while that of the ondansetron group (Group B) was 35.91 ± 12.7 years. A statistically significant difference was observed between the groups regarding nausea severity and episode frequency; however, no significant difference was found in vomiting events. Acupressure demonstrated superior effectiveness in reducing both the severity and frequency of postoperative nausea, as well as in minimizing vomiting episodes, compared to ondansetron.
The findings suggest that acupressure at the PC6 point is more effective than ondansetron in managing PONV, particularly in reducing symptom duration and intensity.
本研究的目的是比较昂丹司琼与心包经6穴(PC6或内关)穴位按压在处理术后恶心呕吐(PONV)方面的疗效。
本观察性研究于2019年至2020年在阿联酋迪拜Prime医院骨科进行。数据收集包括两个主要部分。第一部分涉及记录人口统计学细节,包括患者的年龄、性别和教育水平。第二部分使用经过验证的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估恶心和呕吐的严重程度,范围为0至10,其中0表示无恶心,1 - 3表示轻度恶心,4 - 7表示中度恶心,8 - 10表示重度恶心。术后1小时、3小时和7小时记录症状的严重程度和频率。
穴位按压组(A组)的平均年龄为38.92±12.11岁,而昂丹司琼组(B组)的平均年龄为35.91±12.7岁。两组在恶心严重程度和发作频率方面存在统计学显著差异;然而,在呕吐事件方面未发现显著差异。与昂丹司琼相比,穴位按压在减轻术后恶心的严重程度和频率以及减少呕吐发作方面显示出更好的效果。
研究结果表明,心包经6穴穴位按压在处理术后恶心呕吐方面比昂丹司琼更有效,特别是在缩短症状持续时间和减轻症状强度方面。