Theroux Susanna, Sepulveda Adam, Abbott Cathryn L, Gold Zachary, Watts Alison W, Hunter Margaret E, Klymus Katy E, Hirsch Shana Lee, Craine Joseph M, Jones Devin N, Brown Rachel J, Steele Joshua A, Takahashi Miwa, Noble Rachel T, Darling John A
Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa, CA, USA.
U.S. Geological Survey, Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Metabarcoding Metagenom. 2025;9:e132076. doi: 10.3897/mbmg.9.132076. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
The rapid advancement of environmental DNA (eDNA) science in the past two decades has inspired a concomitant growth in the development of eDNA sampling and analytical methods. However, these methods are often developed by individual laboratories or institutions, which can isolate protocols within programmes, agencies or regions and prevent the beneficial exchange of data and ideas. Recent efforts to advance national and international coordination have resulted in a groundswell of standardisation efforts, but there is still considerable confusion around the role of formal standards for regulatory or research applications. With this commentary, we hope to provide clarity on the terminology used in standardisation discussions, including the differences between formal standards and best practice guidelines. Additionally, we discuss how eDNA method choice may be informed by environmental management scenarios and review examples of formal eDNA method standards being used to inform management action. The eDNA community now has an opportunity to develop a roadmap for method development to help close standardisation gaps, advance eDNA method adoption and accelerate our ability to monitor biological life at the scales our current environmental challenges demand.
在过去二十年中,环境DNA(eDNA)科学的迅速发展激发了eDNA采样和分析方法开发的相应增长。然而,这些方法通常由单个实验室或机构开发,这可能会使程序、机构或地区内的协议孤立起来,并阻碍数据和想法的有益交流。最近推进国家和国际协调的努力导致了标准化工作的热潮,但对于正式标准在监管或研究应用中的作用仍存在相当大的困惑。通过这篇评论,我们希望澄清标准化讨论中使用的术语,包括正式标准和最佳实践指南之间的差异。此外,我们讨论环境管理情景如何为eDNA方法选择提供依据,并回顾正式的eDNA方法标准用于指导管理行动的示例。eDNA社区现在有机会制定方法开发路线图,以帮助弥合标准化差距,促进eDNA方法的采用,并加快我们在当前环境挑战所需规模上监测生物生命的能力。