Suppr超能文献

高级内镜手术后的内镜下手工缝合:上消化道和下消化道31例患者的早期结果(附视频)

Endoscopic hand suturing after advanced endoscopic procedures: early outcomes of 31 cases in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract (with video).

作者信息

Orzeszko Zofia, Kasprzyk Przemysław, Zawada Urszula, Szura Mirosław, Spychalski Michał

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.

Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Hospital of Brothers Hospitallers of St. John of God, Kraków, Poland.

出版信息

Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2025 Feb 10;20(1):44-50. doi: 10.20452/wiitm.2025.17928. eCollection 2025 Apr 9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic hand suturing (EHS) has emerged as a promising modality in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic procedures. Reports on its effectiveness in clinical practice remain limited due to its recent adoption.

AIM

This study aimed to describe a single- center experience regarding EHS and its outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single -center retrospective study analyzed individuals that underwent advanced endoscopic procedures in the upper and lower GI tract followed by EHS. Defined features (suturing time and speed) and outcomes (postprocedural bleeding, abdominal pain) were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty- one patients were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) size of the resected lesions was 20 (20-30) mm, and the median (IQR) diameter of the sutured defects was 25 (20-31) mm. The overall suturing time was 25 minutes, with a mean (SD) speed of 1.12 (0.5) mm/min. It varied in different locations, with the fastest closure in the proximal stomach (mean [SD], 25 [13.1] min; 1.27 [0.32] mm/min) and the longest in the rectum (mean [SD], 33 [16.2] min; 0.92 [0.4] mm/min). No symptoms of GI bleeding were reported during early and 4-week follow-up. One case (4.5%) of abdominal pain was reported for the upper GI tract, and none for the lower GI tract.

CONCLUSIONS

EHS is a safe and effective technique for managing defects in both gastric and rectal advanced endoscopic procedures. Its potential application in preventing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection bleeding in high-risk patients is promising. The duration and complexity of the procedure remain the challenges that may limit its broader adoption. Further research and standardized training are imperative to optimize EHS outcomes and establish it as a routine practice in endoscopic surgery.

摘要

引言

内镜下手工缝合(EHS)已成为胃肠道(GI)内镜手术中一种有前景的方式。由于其应用时间较短,关于其在临床实践中有效性的报道仍然有限。

目的

本研究旨在描述关于EHS及其结果的单中心经验。

材料与方法

这项单中心回顾性研究分析了在上、下消化道接受高级内镜手术并随后进行EHS的个体。评估了明确的特征(缝合时间和速度)以及结果(术后出血、腹痛)。

结果

31例患者纳入分析。切除病变的中位(四分位间距[IQR])大小为20(20 - 30)mm,缝合缺损的中位(IQR)直径为25(20 - 31)mm。总体缝合时间为25分钟,平均(标准差)速度为1.12(0.5)mm/分钟。在不同部位有所不同,胃近端闭合最快(平均[标准差],25[13.1]分钟;1.27[0.32]mm/分钟),直肠最长(平均[标准差],33[16.2]分钟;0.92[0.4]mm/分钟)。在早期和4周随访期间未报告胃肠道出血症状。上消化道报告1例(4.5%)腹痛,下消化道未报告。

结论

EHS是一种安全有效的技术,可用于处理胃和直肠高级内镜手术中的缺损。其在预防高危患者内镜下黏膜下剥离术后出血方面的潜在应用前景广阔。该手术的持续时间和复杂性仍然是可能限制其更广泛应用的挑战。进一步的研究和标准化培训对于优化EHS结果并将其确立为内镜手术的常规操作至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e61b/12177354/ad4184c0556b/vomt-20-1-17928-g1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验