Long Dechao, Gu Yanhong, Wang Yang
Nursing Department, Shanghai Fifth People's Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
School of Nursing, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2025 Jun 17;18:1423-1433. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S518799. eCollection 2025.
This study aimed to explore the relationship between SOC, coping strategies, and caregiver burden, and analyze the mediating role of coping strategies in the relationship between SOC and caregiver burden.
A cross-sectional study was carried out, involving 230 informal caregivers of people with dementia in Shanghai, China. The data collection period is May 21, 2024, to December 31, 2024. This study involved participants who filled out various questionnaires, encompassing demographic data, Sense of Coherence Scale (SOC-13), Brief COPE inventory, and Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Adoption of SPSS 27.0 for statistical analysis and Hayes' PROCESS (Model 4), and the mediating effect was validated by the bias-corrected nonparametric percentile bootstrap method.
The caregiver burden was found at a moderate to severe level with the average score of 58.14(12.84). There was a negative correlation between SOC and caregiver burden (r = -0.655, P<0.05), a positive correlation between SOC and emotion-focused coping strategies (r = 0.397, P<0.05), and a negative correlation between SOC and dysfunctional coping strategies (r = -0.513, P<0.05). However, there was no significant correlation between SOC and problem-focused coping strategies. The relationship between SOC and caregiver burden was partially mediated by emotion-focused strategies and dysfunctional coping strategies.
Significant relationship was found that SOC correlated with caregiver burden; To some extent, emotion-focused and dysfunctional coping strategies moderated the relationship between SOC and caregiver burden. Future interventions could focus on adapting and optimizing the coping behaviors of informal caregivers, using mediating mechanisms as entry points, with the aim of achieving more precise and effective care support.
本研究旨在探讨连贯感(SOC)、应对策略与照顾者负担之间的关系,并分析应对策略在SOC与照顾者负担关系中的中介作用。
开展了一项横断面研究,涉及中国上海230名痴呆症患者的非正式照顾者。数据收集期为2024年5月21日至2024年12月31日。本研究纳入了填写各种问卷的参与者,包括人口统计学数据、连贯感量表(SOC-13)、简易应对方式问卷和 Zarit 负担访谈量表(ZBI)。采用SPSS 27.0进行统计分析,并使用Hayes的PROCESS(模型4),通过偏差校正非参数百分位Bootstrap法验证中介效应。
照顾者负担处于中度至重度水平,平均得分为58.14(12.84)。SOC与照顾者负担呈负相关(r = -0.655,P<0.05),SOC与情绪聚焦应对策略呈正相关(r = 0.397,P<0.05),SOC与功能失调应对策略呈负相关(r = -0.513,P<0.05)。然而,SOC与问题聚焦应对策略之间无显著相关性。SOC与照顾者负担之间的关系部分由情绪聚焦策略和功能失调应对策略介导。
发现SOC与照顾者负担之间存在显著关系;在一定程度上,情绪聚焦和功能失调应对策略调节了SOC与照顾者负担之间的关系。未来的干预措施可以以中介机制为切入点,着重调整和优化非正式照顾者的应对行为,以实现更精准有效的照护支持。