Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜胃癌全胃切除术后重叠式与π形食管空肠吻合术的比较研究

Overlap Versus π-Shaped Esophagojejunostomy After Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Comparative Study.

作者信息

Zhang Luyang, Ma Junjun, Li Jingzhu, Zhang Sen, Hong Hiju, Zhao Xuan, Feng Bo, He Zirui, Yang Xiao, Zang Lu, Zheng Minhua, Fingerhut Abe

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai.

Department of General Surgery, Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefectural People's Hospital, Shangri-La, P.R. China.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2025 Aug 1;35(4):e1388. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001388.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of medical professionals are choosing to use totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG) as a treatment option for gastric cancer. However, the optimal reconstruction method is still under debate. The objective of this study is to evaluate the immediate results of 2 intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy techniques: overlap (isoperistaltic side-to-side) (O) and pi-shaped (π) (anisoperistaltic side-to-side) anastomosis.

METHODS

Hospital records of 110 patients who underwent esophagojejunostomy (group O, n=65 or group π, n=45) after TLTG from January 2016 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics, along with the surgical and pathologic results, were recorded, compared, and evaluated for immediate impacts.

RESULTS

The demographic characteristics of the 2 groups exhibited no significant disparities. Moreover, there were no statistically notable differences in tumor size, lymph node count, or TNM stage between the 2 groups. All surgeries were successfully completed without any complications or need for conversion to laparotomy, and there were no occurrences of postoperative mortality. In addition, there were no statistically significant variances between the 2 groups in terms of total operation time, estimated blood loss, time to first flatus, or length of postoperative hospital stay. Time for esophagojejunostomy, however, was statistically significantly shorter in group π than in group O (27.4±5.2 vs. 36.7±5.0 min) ( P <0.001). No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups with regard to postoperative complications: 5 grade I, 6 grade II, and 1 grade IIIa in group O (n=12) versus 5 grade I, 3 grade II, 2 grade IIIa, and 1 grade IIIb in group π (n=11). At 6-month endoscopy and oral water-soluble contrast medium follow-up, no anastomotic complication was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The π anastomosis is feasible, safe, with the need for fewer cartridges and is eventually a time-saving procedure for esophagojejunostomy with no hand-sewing involved. In this study, both methods have shown favorable short-term results in the treatment of gastric cancer.

摘要

背景

越来越多的医学专业人员选择采用全腹腔镜全胃切除术(TLTG)作为胃癌的治疗选择。然而,最佳重建方法仍存在争议。本研究的目的是评估两种体内食管空肠吻合技术的近期效果:重叠(顺蠕动侧侧)(O)吻合和π形(逆蠕动侧侧)吻合。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2019年12月期间110例行TLTG术后接受食管空肠吻合术的患者的医院记录(O组,n = 65;π组,n = 45)。记录、比较并评估人口统计学和临床病理特征以及手术和病理结果的近期影响。

结果

两组的人口统计学特征无显著差异。此外,两组在肿瘤大小、淋巴结计数或TNM分期方面无统计学上的显著差异。所有手术均成功完成,无任何并发症,也无需转为开腹手术,且无术后死亡病例。此外,两组在总手术时间、估计失血量、首次排气时间或术后住院时间方面无统计学上的显著差异。然而,π组的食管空肠吻合时间在统计学上显著短于O组(27.4±5.2对36.7±5.0分钟)(P <0.001)。两组术后并发症方面无统计学上的显著差异:O组有5例I级、6例II级和1例IIIa级(n = 12),π组有5例I级、3例II级、2例IIIa级和1例IIIb级(n = 11)。在6个月的内镜检查和口服水溶性造影剂随访中,未发现吻合口并发症。

结论

π吻合可行、安全,所需钉仓较少,最终是一种无需手工缝合的节省时间的食管空肠吻合术。在本研究中,两种方法在胃癌治疗中均显示出良好的短期效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验