Meyer-Rath Gesine, Jamieson Lise, Mudimu Edinah, Imai-Eaton Jeffrey W, Johnson Leigh F
Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office (HE RO), University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
South African Centre for Epidemiological Modelling and Analysis (SACEMA), Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
AIDS. 2025 Aug 1;39(10):1476-1480. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000004272. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
BACKGROUND: Globally, shifts in United States foreign-aid policy have put HIV funding under duress. South Africa is unique in the region because its HIV program is largely domestically funded, although donor funds and partnerships support key components. We estimated the potential epidemiological impact of ceasing provision of services currently supported by PEPFAR and the costs and cost-effectiveness to the South African government (SAG) of potentially taking over these services. METHODS: We used a costed version of Thembisa, a South African HIV transmission model, to simulate four scenarios: a minimum scenario assuming intervention coverage reducing proportional to PEPFAR's funding share of specific activities in 2023; a maximum scenario assuming additional health system impacts; and sub-scenarios either with 3-year recovery (2029-2031) or no recovery to previous coverage. HIV program costs were estimated from the provider perspective (SAG) in 2024/25 US dollars. RESULTS: Over 2025-2028, discontinuing activities currently funded by PEPFAR in South Africa without replacement by SAG would result in 150 000-296 000 additional new HIV infections (29-56% increase) and 56 000-65 000 additional AIDS-related deaths (33-38%). Permanent discontinuation of currently PEPFAR-supported services over the next 20 years increases this to 1.1-2.1 million additional new HIV infections and 519 000-712 000 additional AIDS-related deaths. Sustaining these services would cost an additional $620 million to $1.4 billion between 2025 and 2028. Under a reduced budget, the most cost-effective interventions to preserve are ART and PrEP for key populations. CONCLUSION: Unmanaged PEPFAR exit from South Africa threatens to undo a decade of progress unless services are taken over by other funders, including SAG.
背景:在全球范围内,美国对外援助政策的转变使艾滋病病毒(HIV)资金面临压力。南非在该地区具有独特性,因为其HIV项目主要由国内提供资金,尽管捐助资金和伙伴关系支持关键部分。我们估计了停止提供目前由美国总统艾滋病紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)支持的服务可能产生的流行病学影响,以及南非政府(SAG)接管这些服务的成本和成本效益。 方法:我们使用了南非HIV传播模型Thembisa的成本核算版本,来模拟四种情景:一种最低情景,假设干预覆盖率按PEPFAR在2023年对特定活动的资金份额成比例降低;一种最高情景,假设对卫生系统有额外影响;以及分别有3年恢复期(2029 - 2031年)或无法恢复到先前覆盖率的子情景。HIV项目成本从提供者(SAG)的角度以2024/25年美元进行估算。 结果:在2025 - 2028年期间,如果南非政府不接管而停止目前由PEPFAR资助的活动,将导致额外150000 - 296000例新的HIV感染(增加29% - 56%)以及56000 - 65000例与艾滋病相关的额外死亡(增加33% - 38%)。在未来20年永久停止目前由PEPFAR支持的服务,这一数字将增加到额外110万 - 210万例新的HIV感染以及519000 - 712000例与艾滋病相关的额外死亡。在2025年至2028年期间维持这些服务将额外花费6.2亿美元至14亿美元。在预算减少的情况下,最具成本效益的保留干预措施是针对关键人群的抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)和暴露前预防(PrEP)。 结论:除非包括南非政府在内的其他资助者接管服务,否则PEPFAR无管理地退出南非可能会使十年的进展付诸东流。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008-7-16
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011-3-16
J Int AIDS Soc. 2025-7