China-Australia Joint Research Center for Infectious Diseases, School of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Feb;12(2):e243-e256. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00536-3.
Men who have sex with men (MSM) in the Asia-Pacific region have a disproportionately high burden of HIV infection compared with the general population. Although pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is highly effective at preventing new HIV infections, the cost-effectiveness of PrEP for MSM in different countries in the Asia-Pacific region with varying PrEP coverage and HIV testing frequencies remains unstudied. We aimed to analyse the economic and health benefits of long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) compared with oral PrEP in high-income countries and low-income and middle-income countries within the Asia-Pacific region.
We developed a decision-analytic Markov model to evaluate the population impact and cost-effectiveness of PrEP scale-up among MSM in Australia, Thailand, and China. We assumed a static cohort of 100 000 MSM aged 18 years or older who were at risk of HIV infection, with a monthly cycle length over a 40-year time period. We evaluated hypothetical scenarios with universal PrEP coverage of 80% among 100 000 suitable MSM in each country. We modelled oral PrEP and CAB-LA for MSM with diverse HIV testing frequency strategies. We adopted the health-care system's perspective with a 3% annual discount rate. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), measured as additional cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, to compare different strategies with the status quo in each country. All costs were reported in 2021 US$. We also performed one-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our findings.
Compared with the status quo in each country, expanding oral PrEP to 80% of suitable MSM would avert 8·1% of new HIV infections in Australia, 14·5% in Thailand, and 26·4% in China in a 40-year period. Expanding oral PrEP use with 6-monthly HIV testing for both PrEP and non-PrEP users was cost-saving for Australia. Similarly, expanding oral PrEP use remained the most cost-effective strategy in both Thailand and China, but optimal testing frequency varied, with annual testing in Thailand (ICER $4707 per QALY gained) and 3-monthly testing in China (ICER $16 926 per QALY gained) for both PrEP and non-PrEP users. We also found that replacing oral PrEP with CAB-LA for MSM could avert more new HIV infections (12·8% in Australia, 27·6% in Thailand, and 32·8% in China), but implementing CAB-LA was not cost-effective due to its high cost. The cost of CAB-LA would need to be reduced by 50-90% and be used as a complementary strategy to oral PrEP to be cost-effective in these countries.
Expanding oral PrEP use for MSM, with country-specific testing frequency, is cost-effective in Australia, Thailand, and China. Due to the high cost, CAB-LA is currently not affordable as a single-use strategy but might be offered as an additional option to oral PrEP.
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China, the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, National Key Research and Development Program of China, and National Natural Science Foundation of China.
与一般人群相比,亚太地区男男性行为者(MSM)的 HIV 感染负担不成比例地高。尽管 HIV 暴露前预防(PrEP)在预防新的 HIV 感染方面非常有效,但在不同国家和地区, PrEP 覆盖率和 HIV 检测频率不同,其成本效益仍有待研究。我们旨在分析在亚太地区高收入国家和低收入及中等收入国家中,长效注射用卡替拉韦(CAB-LA)与口服 PrEP 相比的经济效益和健康效益。
我们开发了一个决策分析马尔可夫模型,以评估 MSM 在澳大利亚、泰国和中国接受 PrEP 扩大规模的人群影响和成本效益。我们假设一个由 10 万名年龄在 18 岁或以上、有 HIV 感染风险的 MSM 组成的静态队列,每月周期长度为 40 年。我们评估了在每个国家中,有 10 万名合适的 MSM 中 80%接受普遍 PrEP 覆盖的假设情况。我们为不同 HIV 检测频率策略的 MSM 建模了口服 PrEP 和 CAB-LA。我们采用了卫生保健系统的视角,设定了 3%的年度贴现率。我们计算了增量成本效益比(ICER),即每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的额外成本,以比较每个国家的不同策略与现状。所有成本均以 2021 年的美元表示。我们还进行了单向、双向和概率敏感性分析,以评估我们研究结果的稳健性。
与每个国家的现状相比,在 40 年内,将口服 PrEP 扩大到 80%的合适 MSM ,将在澳大利亚减少 8.1%、在泰国减少 14.5%和在中国减少 26.4%的新 HIV 感染。在澳大利亚,对于 PrEP 和非 PrEP 用户,每 6 个月进行一次 HIV 检测,扩大口服 PrEP 的使用可以节省成本。同样,在泰国和中国,扩大口服 PrEP 的使用仍然是最具成本效益的策略,但最佳检测频率有所不同,对于 PrEP 和非 PrEP 用户,泰国的年度检测(ICER 每 QALY 获得 4707 美元)和中国的 3 个月检测(ICER 每 QALY 获得 16926 美元)。我们还发现,用 CAB-LA 替代 MSM 的口服 PrEP 可以减少更多的新 HIV 感染(澳大利亚减少 12.8%,泰国减少 27.6%,中国减少 32.8%),但由于其高成本,实施 CAB-LA 不具有成本效益。CAB-LA 的成本需要降低 50-90%,并作为口服 PrEP 的补充策略,才能在这些国家具有成本效益。
在澳大利亚、泰国和中国,扩大 MSM 使用口服 PrEP,并结合国家特定的检测频率,是具有成本效益的。由于成本高,CAB-LA 目前作为单一用途策略不可负担,但可能作为口服 PrEP 的附加选择提供。
中华人民共和国科学技术部、澳大利亚国家卫生和医学研究理事会、中国国家重点研发计划、中国国家自然科学基金。