Miller Julia, Cavalli Camila, Azadian Amin, Protopopova Alexandra
Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Department of Immunology, Pathophysiology and Veterinary Preventive Medicine, University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Wroclaw, Poland.
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 23;20(6):e0326368. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326368. eCollection 2025.
Learning and stress resilience can be influenced by recent experiences. Research has traditionally focused on the effects of negative situations and stressors on subsequent learning and stress resilience, while knowledge is limited regarding the effects of positive experiences. We aimed to examine the impact of a pre-session brief positive experience on dogs' learning and stress resilience. Pet dogs were quasi-randomly assigned to the experimental (n = 20) or control (n = 20) group, counterbalanced for age, sex, and breed clade. Experimental dogs received a session intended to provide a positive experience, which included a 15 min walk on a long leash, human interaction, exploration, playing, and olfactory-based foraging. Control dogs were kept on leash in an office without being allowed to explore nor interact with their owner or the experimenters for 15 min. After 60 s of habituation to the testing room, all dogs were taught to nose-touch the experimenter's hand. After the Learning phase, there was a 2 min Disruption phase, in which a remote-controlled car moved inside of a tub at a distance. Measures included the number of hand touches in each phase, the latency to return to the task, and general stress and affiliative behaviours. No differences were observed in the Learning phase. Surprisingly, experimental dogs exhibited higher stress levels than control dogs during the Disruption phase. These dogs also spent a significantly higher proportion of time in proximity to their owners, which could be interpreted as reassurance-seeking behaviour. Contrary to our predictions, exposure to a brief positive experience did not impact learning and, surprisingly, seemed to have made dogs more susceptible to stress during the Disruption phase. Several possible explanations are discussed, including the possibility of an unintentional induction of a negative emotional state by the termination of the positive experience, as well as differences in arousal, or habituation to the indoor environment.
学习能力和应激恢复力会受到近期经历的影响。传统研究主要关注负面情境和应激源对后续学习及应激恢复力的影响,而关于积极经历的影响,相关知识却很有限。我们旨在探究会前简短积极经历对犬类学习能力和应激恢复力的影响。宠物犬被准随机分配到实验组(n = 20)或对照组(n = 20),并根据年龄、性别和品种类别进行了平衡。实验组的犬接受了一次旨在提供积极体验的活动,包括用长绳牵行15分钟、与人类互动、探索、玩耍以及基于嗅觉的觅食。对照组的犬被用皮带拴在办公室里,15分钟内不允许探索,也不允许与主人或实验人员互动。在对测试室适应60秒后,所有犬都被教导用鼻子触碰实验人员的手。学习阶段结束后,有一个2分钟的干扰阶段,期间一辆遥控汽车在一定距离内在桶内移动。测量指标包括每个阶段的手部触碰次数、回到任务的潜伏期以及一般应激和亲和行为。在学习阶段未观察到差异。令人惊讶的是,在干扰阶段,实验组的犬表现出比对照组更高的应激水平。这些犬靠近主人的时间比例也显著更高,这可被解释为寻求安慰的行为。与我们的预测相反,接触简短的积极经历并未影响学习,而且令人惊讶的是,这似乎使犬在干扰阶段更容易受到应激影响。我们讨论了几种可能的解释,包括积极体验结束可能无意引发负面情绪状态的可能性,以及唤醒水平差异或对室内环境的适应情况。