Department of Orthopaedics, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Institute of Orthopedics of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Orthop Surg. 2019 Dec;11(6):1029-1038. doi: 10.1111/os.12544. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
To summarize the indications and the clinical effects of a transfibular neck osteotomy approach and a combined anterolateral and posterolateral approach in the treatment of fractures of the lateral tibial plateau involving the posterolateral column.
Eleven patients with lateral tibial plateau fractures were included in the present study. The fractures were Schatzker type II or lateral platform fractures involving posterolateral column. The anterolateral combined posterolateral approach (lateral + posterolateral locking plate fixation) was applied in 7 patients and 4 patients underwent transfibular neck osteotomy (lateral + posterolateral locking plate fixation + 1/4 tubular plate edge fixation, fibular osteotomy with Kirschner wire tension band fixation, and hollow nail fixation for upper tibiofibular joint). All cases were followed up for 12-24 months, with an average follow-up of 17.5 ± 5.0 months. At the last followup, the Rasmussen radiological criteria were used to evaluate the effect of fracture reduction and fixation. The knee joint function was evaluated using the knee function evaluation criteria of the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS). The Lachman test and the pivot-shift test were used to evaluate the anterior and posterior and rotational stability of the knee joint. The range of knee motion was recorded.
Bone healing was achieved in all patients with fractures treated with a transfibular neck osteotomy approach and a combined anterolateral and posterolateral approach. At the last follow-up, both the Lachman test and the pivot-shift test results were negative. All patients had complete knee extension. For the combined anterolateral and posterolateral approach, the knee flexion angle was 110°-130°, with an average of 122.86° ± 7.56°. For the transfibular neck osteotomy approach, the knee flexion angle was 115°-130°, with an average of 120.00° ± 7.07°. For the patients in which the combined anterolateral and posterolateral approach was used, the Rasmussen score was 12-18 points, with an average of 16.00 ± 2.56 points. The results were excellent in 4 cases and good in 3 cases; therefore, 100% of results were excellent or good. For patients in which the transfibular neck osteotomy approach was used, the Rasmussen score was 10-18 points, with an average of 15.25 ± 3.77 points. The results were excellent in 2 cases, good in 1 case, and acceptable in 1 case; therefore, 75% of results were excellent or good. The HSS score for the combined anterolateral and posterolateral approach was 76-98 points, with an average of 88.43 ± 7.55 points. The results were excellent in 5 cases and good in 2 cases; therefore, 100% of results were excellent or good. The HSS score for the transfibular neck osteotomy approach was 74-96 points, with an average of 87.25 ± 9.43 points. The results were excellent in 3 cases and good in 1 case; therefore, 100% of results were excellent or good. There were no significant differences in operation time, surgical blood loss, fracture healing time, postoperative imaging score, and knee function evaluation between the two approaches. One patient who underwent transfibular neck osteotomy had a 3-mm step that gradually appeared, but no significant abnormalities were found in the width of the platform and the lower limb force line. One patient in whom the combined anterolateral and posterolateral approach was used showed numbness in the common peroneal nerve. No common peroneal nerve injury occurred through the transfibular neck osteotomy approach.
The anterolateral combined posterolateral approach and the transfibular neck osteotomy approach are effective in the surgical treatment of lateral tibial plateau fractures involving the posterolateral column. However, the transfibular neck osteotomy approach is more suitable for the posterolateral plateau articular surface damaged with bone separation and displacement, deep collapse, cases involving a large range of the posterolateral column, especially fractures of the lateral tibial plateau in the upper tibiofibular syndesmosis area of the line connecting the anterior and posterior margin of the fibular head to the midpoint of the plateau.
总结经腓骨颈截骨入路联合前外侧和后外侧入路治疗累及后外侧柱的胫骨外侧平台骨折的适应证和临床疗效。
本研究纳入 11 例胫骨外侧平台骨折患者,骨折类型为 Schatzker Ⅱ型或累及后外侧柱的外侧平台骨折。7 例患者采用前外侧联合后外侧入路(外侧+后外侧锁定钢板固定),4 例患者采用经腓骨颈截骨入路(外侧+后外侧锁定钢板固定+1/4 管状钢板边缘固定、腓骨骨折采用克氏针张力带固定、胫骨中上 1/3 联合腓骨中上 1/3 空心钉固定)。所有患者均获得随访,随访时间 12-24 个月,平均 17.5±5.0 个月。末次随访时,采用 Rasmussen 影像学评分标准评估骨折复位和固定效果,采用美国特种外科医院(HSS)膝关节功能评分标准评估膝关节功能,采用 Lachman 试验和抽屉试验评估膝关节前后向和旋转稳定性,记录膝关节活动度。
经腓骨颈截骨入路和前外侧联合后外侧入路治疗的骨折患者均获得骨性愈合。末次随访时,Lachman 试验和抽屉试验结果均为阴性,所有患者膝关节均完全伸直。对于前外侧联合后外侧入路,膝关节屈曲角度为 110°-130°,平均 122.86°±7.56°;对于经腓骨颈截骨入路,膝关节屈曲角度为 115°-130°,平均 120.00°±7.07°。采用前外侧联合后外侧入路的患者中,Rasmussen 评分 12-18 分,平均 16.00±2.56 分;结果优 4 例,良 3 例,优良率为 100%。采用经腓骨颈截骨入路的患者中,Rasmussen 评分 10-18 分,平均 15.25±3.77 分;结果优 2 例,良 1 例,可 1 例,优良率为 75%。采用前外侧联合后外侧入路的患者中,HSS 评分 76-98 分,平均 88.43±7.55 分;结果优 5 例,良 2 例,优良率为 100%。采用经腓骨颈截骨入路的患者中,HSS 评分 74-96 分,平均 87.25±9.43 分;结果优 3 例,良 1 例,优良率为 100%。两种手术入路的手术时间、手术出血量、骨折愈合时间、术后影像学评分和膝关节功能评分比较,差异均无统计学意义。经腓骨颈截骨入路的 1 例患者出现逐渐出现的 3mm 台阶,但平台宽度和下肢力线未见明显异常;前外侧联合后外侧入路的 1 例患者出现腓总神经麻木,但无腓总神经损伤。经腓骨颈截骨入路未发生腓总神经损伤。
经腓骨颈截骨入路联合前外侧和后外侧入路治疗累及后外侧柱的胫骨外侧平台骨折效果确切,但经腓骨颈截骨入路更适合后外侧关节面伴有骨分离和移位、深度塌陷、累及后外侧柱范围较大,特别是累及腓骨头上部连接前后缘中点与胫骨平台连线的胫骨中上 1/3 与腓骨中上 1/3 联合的外侧胫骨平台骨折。