Fucito Lisa M, Baldassarri Stephen R, Wu Ran, Gueorguieva Ralitza, Morean Meghan E, Herbst Roy S, Krishnan-Sarin Suchitra, O'Malley Stephanie S
Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Tob Control. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1136/tc-2024-059094.
Oral nicotine pouches may have potential for smoking cessation, but scientific evidence on the effects of pouches and their constituents on smoking behaviour is limited.
This study was a 4-week, open-label, randomised pilot trial of nicotine pouches in 3 mg (low) or 6 mg (high) nicotine strength.
US outpatient research clinic with non-treatment seeking adults who smoke cigarettes (N=30).
Participants selected two flavours and were instructed to switch to using nicotine pouches in place of cigarettes.
We compared groups on cigarettes smoked per day, pouch use and urinary levels of a tobacco-specific carcinogen (NNAL) over 4 weeks, biochemically verified 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence at week 4, and willingness to continue pouch use.
Nearly all participants completed the trial (29/30). Participants in both groups significantly reduced their cigarettes smoked per day (log-transformed) over time (F=3.8, p=0.01). The 6 mg group reported numerically greater, but non-significant, reductions in smoking than the 3 mg group (least-square mean difference (LSMD) at week 1=0.008; 95% CI -0.42-0.44; LSMD at week 4=0.38; 95%CI -0.06-0.81). The 6 mg group also reported numerically higher, but non-significant, likelihood of complete smoking abstinence (13% vs 0%) and willingness to continue pouch use (67% vs 40%). There were no differences by group or time for NNAL.
Results provide preliminary support for nicotine pouches for cigarette substitution. Compared with lower nicotine strength pouches, higher nicotine strength pouches may have a greater impact on smoking behaviour and adults who smoke may be more willing to use them.
NCT04250727.
口服尼古丁袋可能具有戒烟潜力,但关于尼古丁袋及其成分对吸烟行为影响的科学证据有限。
本研究为一项为期4周的开放标签随机试点试验,使用尼古丁强度为3毫克(低)或6毫克(高)的尼古丁袋。
美国门诊研究诊所招募的不寻求治疗的吸烟成年人(N = 30)。
参与者选择两种口味,并被指示改用尼古丁袋代替香烟。
我们比较了两组在4周内每天吸烟量、尼古丁袋使用情况以及一种烟草特异性致癌物(NNAL)的尿液水平,通过生化验证的第4周7天点患病率戒烟情况,以及继续使用尼古丁袋的意愿。
几乎所有参与者都完成了试验(29/30)。随着时间的推移,两组参与者每天吸烟量(对数转换后)均显著减少(F = 3.8,p = 0.01)。6毫克组报告的吸烟减少量在数值上大于3毫克组,但差异无统计学意义(第1周最小二乘均值差(LSMD)= 0.008;95%置信区间 -0.42 - 0.44;第4周LSMD = 0.38;95%置信区间 -0.06 - 0.81)。6毫克组报告的完全戒烟可能性(13%对0%)和继续使用尼古丁袋的意愿(67%对40%)在数值上也更高,但差异无统计学意义。两组在NNAL方面无组间或时间差异。
结果为尼古丁袋替代香烟提供了初步支持。与低尼古丁强度的尼古丁袋相比,高尼古丁强度的尼古丁袋可能对吸烟行为有更大影响,吸烟成年人可能更愿意使用它们。
NCT04250727。