三个亚洲国家基于学校的心理健康素养比较研究。
Comparative study on school-based mental health literacy in three Asian countries.
作者信息
Shibuya Fumiko, Usami Masahide, Santillan Marian Danille, Warnaini Cut, Gregorio Ernesto, Satake Naoko, Estrada Crystal Amiel, Gunawan Gunawan, Balderrama Norieta, Fernandez de Leon Japhet, Ancheta Joie Fe, Kadriyan Hamsu, Garcia Fernando, Kobayashi Jun
机构信息
Department of Global Health, Graduate School of Health Sciences, University of the Ryukyus, 1076 Kiyuna, Ginowan, Okinawa, 901-2725, Japan.
Japanese Consortium for Global School Health Research, Ginowan, Japan.
出版信息
Trop Med Health. 2025 Jun 23;53(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s41182-025-00697-6.
INTRODUCTION
Mental health literacy is essential for the recognition, management, and prevention of mental disorders among school-aged children. However, few studies have examined the implementation status of school-based mental health literacy in Asian countries. This study aims to compare the approaches taken by the Philippines, Indonesia, and Japan in managing school-based mental health literacy through curriculum-related policies.
METHODS
The collected documents of this study analyzed both policies (formulated from 2000 to 2023) and curricula (from grade 1 to grade 12) that were adapted to the deductive content analysis methods. Policies were analyzed using the policy triangle framework (Walt and Gilson in Health Policy Plan 9:353-370, 1994) and mapped using the review points (Margaretha et al. in Front Psychiatry 14:1126767, 2023). Curricula were analyzed using the definition of mental health literacy (Jorm in Am Psychol 67:231-243, 2012). This study focused on mental health laws and policies in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Japan, highlighting their success in addressing the needs of adults and school-aged children. By considering each country's unique socio-cultural contexts and basic educational approaches, this study identified diverse strategies and methodologies in addressing mental health challenges. Using a common analytic framework, this study collected and analyzed policies and curricula on mental health literacy from the three countries (Philippines, 22; Indonesia, 9; and Japan, 6). The basic education curricula developed by their respective Ministries of Education were used.
RESULTS
This study highlights two key findings on school-based mental health literacy. First, mental health literacy is incorporated into health and physical education in Japan, health, values education and homeroom guidance in the Philippines, and religious education in Indonesia. Second, while the Philippines and Indonesia implement mental health education based on established policies, Japan lacks a core mental health literacy policy but has developed and implemented related curricula through its course of study guidelines. The curriculum analysis identified a specific challenge: a lack of "first aid skills to support others who are developing a mental disorder or are in a mental health crisis".
CONCLUSIONS
This study revealed the partial implementation of mental health literacy education in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Japan. The Philippines offers a nearly comprehensive curriculum on mental health literacy (grades 1-12), Japan incorporates it into health education (grades 5-10), and Indonesia integrates it into religious education (grades 1-12). While the Philippines and Indonesia align with mental health policies, Japan relies on its national curriculum without a core policy. A key challenge was indicated involving teachers, guidance counselors, or school health personnel as key actors to support students with mental disorders or those potentially at risk, as well as to handle emergency cases of mental disorders in schools. Recommendations include systematic monitoring of the implementation of school-based mental health policies, collaboration with UN agencies to align with international standards while incorporating culturally tailored strategies for each country.
引言
心理健康素养对于识别、管理和预防学龄儿童的精神障碍至关重要。然而,很少有研究考察亚洲国家学校心理健康素养的实施状况。本研究旨在比较菲律宾、印度尼西亚和日本在通过与课程相关的政策管理学校心理健康素养方面所采取的方法。
方法
本研究收集的文件分析了政策(2000年至2023年制定)和课程(从1年级到12年级),采用了演绎式内容分析法。政策使用政策三角框架(沃尔特和吉尔森,《卫生政策规划》9:353 - 370,1994年)进行分析,并使用审查要点进行映射(玛格丽塔等人,《精神病学前沿》14:1126767,2023年)。课程使用心理健康素养的定义(乔姆,《美国心理学家》67:231 - 243,2012年)进行分析。本研究聚焦于菲律宾、印度尼西亚和日本的心理健康法律和政策,突出它们在满足成年人和学龄儿童需求方面的成功之处。通过考虑每个国家独特的社会文化背景和基础教育方法,本研究确定了应对心理健康挑战的不同策略和方法。使用一个共同的分析框架,本研究收集并分析了来自三个国家(菲律宾22份、印度尼西亚9份、日本6份)的心理健康素养政策和课程。使用了各自教育部制定的基础教育课程。
结果
本研究突出了关于学校心理健康素养的两个关键发现。第一,日本将心理健康素养纳入健康与体育教育,菲律宾纳入健康、价值观教育和班主任指导,印度尼西亚纳入宗教教育。第二,虽然菲律宾和印度尼西亚根据既定政策实施心理健康教育,但日本缺乏核心心理健康素养政策,而是通过其学习指导方针制定并实施了相关课程。课程分析确定了一个具体挑战:缺乏“支持正在出现精神障碍或处于心理健康危机中的他人的急救技能”。
结论
本研究揭示了菲律宾、印度尼西亚和日本心理健康素养教育的部分实施情况。菲律宾提供了一份几乎全面的心理健康素养课程(1 - 12年级),日本将其纳入健康教育(5 - 10年级),印度尼西亚将其纳入宗教教育(1 - 12年级)。虽然菲律宾和印度尼西亚与心理健康政策保持一致,但日本依赖其国家课程且没有核心政策。指出了一个关键挑战,即教师、辅导员或学校卫生人员作为关键行为者,要支持有精神障碍的学生或有潜在风险的学生,并处理学校中的精神障碍紧急情况。建议包括对学校心理健康政策的实施进行系统监测,与联合国机构合作以符合国际标准,同时为每个国家纳入量身定制的文化策略。