Kitaguchi Kazuma, Hashimoto Kunihiko, Kaito Takashi, Oshima Kazuya, Wada Eiji
Spine and Spinal Cord Center, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Spine and Spinal Cord Center, General Incorporated Foundation Sumitomo Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Asian Spine J. 2025 Aug;19(4):553-560. doi: 10.31616/asj.2024.0463. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
A retrospective cohort study.
This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of topical and relatively high-dose intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) in minimizing postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF).
Topical TXA demonstrates a similar hemostatic efficacy to intravenous TXA. However, whether intravenous or topical TXA is more effective in minimizing postoperative bleeding in spine surgery remains unclear.
In total, 140 patients who underwent single-level PLIF were retrospectively enrolled and assigned to the (1) control group (n=58), which did not receive TXA; (2) TXA (iv) group (n=39), which was administered intravenously with a relatively high-dose (2 g) of TXA immediately before wound closure; and (3) TXA (t) group (n=43), which received topical application of TXA (1 g in 100 mL of saline solution) to the wound immediately before wound closure.
No significant differences in age, body mass index, sex, preoperative hematological parameters, or intraoperative blood loss were found among the three groups. The total postoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the TXA (t) group than in the TXA (iv) and control groups (389.6±137.5 vs. 543.6±175.4 vs. 700.3±231.4, respectively; both p<0.01). Analysis of blood loss over time revealed significantly less blood loss throughout the postoperative period in the TXA (t) group than in the control group (p<0.01). In contrast, the TXA (iv) group showed less blood loss than the control group in 2-6 hours and 6-12 hours postoperatively (p<0.05). No complications, such as thromboembolic events, were associated with the use of either TXA formulation.
Following single-level PLIF, topical TXA exerts rapid and long-lasting effects on minimizing postoperative blood loss compared with twice the amount of intravenous TXA.
一项回顾性队列研究。
本研究旨在比较局部应用和相对高剂量静脉注射氨甲环酸(TXA)在减少单节段后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)患者术后失血方面的疗效和安全性。
局部应用TXA显示出与静脉注射TXA相似的止血效果。然而,在脊柱手术中,静脉注射还是局部应用TXA在减少术后出血方面更有效仍不清楚。
总共回顾性纳入140例行单节段PLIF的患者,并将其分为:(1)对照组(n = 58),未接受TXA;(2)TXA(静脉注射)组(n = 39),在伤口闭合前立即静脉注射相对高剂量(2 g)的TXA;(3)TXA(局部应用)组(n = 43),在伤口闭合前立即将TXA(1 g溶于100 mL盐溶液中)局部应用于伤口。
三组在年龄、体重指数、性别、术前血液学参数或术中失血量方面均未发现显著差异。TXA(局部应用)组的术后总失血量显著低于TXA(静脉注射)组和对照组(分别为389.6±137.5、543.6±175.4和700.3±231.4;p均<0.01)。对失血量随时间的分析显示,TXA(局部应用)组在整个术后期间的失血量明显少于对照组(p<0.01)。相比之下,TXA(静脉注射)组在术后2 - 6小时和6 - 12小时的失血量少于对照组(p<0.05)。使用任何一种TXA制剂均未出现血栓栓塞事件等并发症。
单节段PLIF术后,与两倍剂量的静脉注射TXA相比,局部应用TXA在减少术后失血方面具有快速且持久的效果。