肢体优势对前交叉韧带重建术后基于功能表现的结果的影响。
The Influence of Limb Dominance on Performance-Based Outcomes After ACL Reconstruction.
作者信息
Hodges Jordan, Bruce Leicht Amelia S, Thompson Xavier D, Werner Brian C, Diduch David R, Brockmeier Stephen F, Gwathmey F Winston, Miller Mark D, Hart Joe M
机构信息
Albany Medical College, Albany, New York.
Sports Medicine Research Institute, University of Kentucky, Department of Athletic Training and Clinical Nutrition, Lexington, Kentucky.
出版信息
Sports Health. 2025 Jun 23:19417381251343089. doi: 10.1177/19417381251343089.
BACKGROUND
Considering limb dominance (LD) may be valuable when utilizing limb symmetry index (LSI) when assessing patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
HYPOTHESIS
Patients will have better performance-based outcomes when index ACLR occurred on the dominant limb (DL) compared with the nondominant limb (NDL).
STUDY DESIGN
Observational cross-sectional study.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level 3.
METHODS
A total of 279 patients (49.1% female, 20.83 ± 5.23 years; 48% DL surgery) completed a laboratory visit (7.65 ± 1.65 months post-ACLR) assessing LD influence on knee extension and flexion peak torque, center of pressure (COP) distance and velocity, and hop performance. LD was defined as the preferred limb to kick a soccer ball. LSI variables were converted to indicator variables and categorized as "Pass" or "Fail" based on LSI ≥ 90%.
RESULTS
Patient LD and isometric knee extension LSI Pass status were significantly associated (χ = 10.09; = 0.001). No additional associations were found between LD and other LSI Pass status variables ( > 0.05). Patients with DL ACLR demonstrated more symmetric knee extension peak torque ( < 0.001, = 0.42) and 6-meter hop ( = 0.02, = 0.25) outcomes; NDL was more symmetric during COP distance tests ( = 0.03, = 0.40). No differences were observed between LD and raw strength or balance measures ( > 0.05). Patients with ACLR on their NDL jumped farther on their contralateral limb for triple-hop ( = 0.03, = 0.23) but not single-hop ( > 0.05) distance.
CONCLUSION
LD appears to influence isometric knee LSI in patients post-ACLR; patients with surgery on their DL achieved higher symmetry and a greater rate of LSI Pass success for knee extension strength.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
Addressing differences in recovery patterns between DL and NDL may improve rehabilitation precision and guide return-to-activity timelines after ACLR.
背景
在利用肢体对称指数(LSI)评估前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)术后患者时,考虑肢体优势(LD)可能具有重要价值。
假设
与非优势肢体(NDL)相比,当在优势肢体(DL)上进行初次ACLR时,患者基于表现的结果会更好。
研究设计
观察性横断面研究。
证据水平
3级。
方法
共有279例患者(49.1%为女性,年龄20.83±5.23岁;48%为DL手术)完成了一次实验室访查(ACLR后7.65±1.65个月),评估LD对膝关节伸展和屈曲峰值扭矩、压力中心(COP)距离和速度以及单腿跳表现的影响。LD定义为踢足球时偏好使用的肢体。LSI变量被转换为指示变量,并根据LSI≥90%分为“通过”或“未通过”。
结果
患者的LD与等长膝关节伸展LSI通过状态显著相关(χ = 10.09;P = 0.001)。在LD与其他LSI通过状态变量之间未发现其他关联(P>0.05)。接受DL ACLR的患者在膝关节伸展峰值扭矩(P<0.001,r = 0.42)和6米单腿跳(P = 0.02,r = 0.25)方面表现出更对称的结果;在COP距离测试中,NDL更对称(P = 0.03,r = 0.40)。在LD与原始力量或平衡测量之间未观察到差异(P>0.05)。接受NDL ACLR的患者在对侧肢体上进行三级跳时跳得更远(P = 0.03,r = 0.23),但单腿跳距离无差异(P>0.05)。
结论
LD似乎会影响ACLR术后患者的等长膝关节LSI;接受DL手术的患者在膝关节伸展力量方面实现了更高的对称性和更高的LSI通过成功率。
临床意义
解决DL和NDL之间恢复模式的差异可能会提高康复的精确性,并指导ACLR术后的恢复活动时间线。