Cacolice Paul A, Starkey Brianna E, Carcia Christopher R, Higgins Paul E
Sports Medicine and Human Performance, Westfield State University.
University of Massachusetts Boston.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Jun 1;17(4):622-627. doi: 10.26603/001c.35593. eCollection 2022.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Recent work has identified non-significant correlations of established limb dominance to the lower extremity (LE) at greater risk for Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) injury in an active, non-athletic sample. The most common LE dominance definition is preferred leg to kick a ball. Athletes develop a unilaterality pattern different from their active, non-athlete peers. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the correlation between the LE used to kick a ball with and the limb identified at greater risk of ACL injury in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division III athletes.
An Observational Descriptive study design.
Forty-six student-athletes that were active on their NCAA Division III football, field hockey, volleyball, and soccer team rosters were recruited. Upon completing consent, participants performed two tasks (kicking a ball; unilateral land) in a counterbalanced order. Data were entered into and analyzed with a commercial statistical software package where a phi coefficient and Chi-squared analysis were performed.
Of the 46 student athletes who participated (Female=32, Male=14, 19.48±1.26years, 171.75±10.47cm, 77.26±18.74kg), 25 participants kicked and landed with the same limb. Twenty participants chose kicking and landing with different limbs. The Phi Coefficient (Φ= 0.001; P= 0.97) indicated little to no relationship between the LE a participant kicked and landed with. Likewise, the Chi-square statistic revealed no statistical differences between observed and expected frequencies (χ2= 0.001; p= 0.97).
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: NCAA Division III athletes display a statistical absence of preferred limb predictability utilizing the most common dominance definition (kicking a ball) as it relates to identifying LE at risk of ACL injury. The results suggest that the prevalent LE dominance definition is problematic when exploring ACL injury risk in this population.
背景/目的:最近的研究发现,在一个活跃的非运动员样本中,已确定的肢体优势与前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤风险较高的下肢(LE)之间存在不显著的相关性。最常见的下肢优势定义是踢球时更喜欢使用的腿。运动员形成的单侧性模式与他们活跃的非运动员同龄人不同。因此,本研究的目的是探讨在国家大学体育协会(NCAA)三级运动员中,用于踢球的下肢与被确定为ACL损伤风险较高的肢体之间的相关性。
一项观察性描述性研究设计。
招募了46名活跃于NCAA三级橄榄球队、曲棍球队、排球队和足球队名单上的学生运动员。在完成同意程序后,参与者以平衡的顺序执行两项任务(踢球;单腿落地)。数据被输入到一个商业统计软件包中进行分析,在该软件包中进行了phi系数和卡方分析。
在参与的46名学生运动员中(女性=32名,男性=14名,年龄19.48±1.26岁,身高171.75±10.47厘米,体重77.26±18.74千克),25名参与者用同一条腿踢球和落地。20名参与者选择用不同的腿踢球和落地。Phi系数(Φ=0.001;P=0.97)表明参与者踢球和落地所用的下肢之间几乎没有关系。同样,卡方统计显示观察频率和预期频率之间没有统计学差异(χ2=0.001;p=0.97)。
讨论/结论:NCAA三级运动员在使用最常见的优势定义(踢球)来确定ACL损伤风险较高的下肢时,在统计学上表现出偏好肢体可预测性的缺失。结果表明,在探索该人群的ACL损伤风险时,普遍使用的下肢优势定义存在问题。