Chen Jilu, Cheng Jianhua, Ye Qiang, Liu Yuntao, Zhang Yanlei, Zhang Zheng
The First School of Clinical Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Department of Neurology, Wenzhou Medical University First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
Front Neurol. 2025 Jun 9;16:1576250. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1576250. eCollection 2025.
The optimal antithrombotic regimen for preventing recurrent stroke in patients who experience ischemic stroke due to atrial fibrillation (AF) and atherosclerotic large-vessel stenosis remains unclear. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of multiple antithrombotic therapies on outcomes after ischemic stroke due to ≥ 2 causes.
Data from 632 patients at a single hospital, who experienced ischemic stroke due to AF and large-artery atherosclerosis. Patients were categorized into 3 groups according to antithrombotic therapy at discharge: antiplatelets (APT), oral anticoagulant(s) (OAC), and APT plus OAC. Study outcomes included recurrent ischemic stroke and composite outcomes for cardiovascular events, death and major bleeding. Propensity scores (PS) were used to balance APT and OAC groups.
Among 632 patients, 158 (25.0%) were treated with APT, 447 (70.7%) with OAC, and 27 (4.3%) with both APT and OAC. After applying PS, only OAC had a significant beneficial effect on the composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19-0.83]; = 0.01) and death (HR 0.12 [95% CI 0.01-1.0]; = 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in one-year recurrent stroke events or risk for bleeding between the APT and OAC groups. Further analysis of the relationship between the dose of OAC and outcome revealed no significant difference between reduced and standard doses of OAC.
This study demonstrated that OAC monotherapy was associated with a lower risk for composite outcomes and death after ischemic stroke due to AF and atherosclerotic stenosis, although the OAC dose had no effect on clinical outcomes.
对于因心房颤动(AF)和动脉粥样硬化性大血管狭窄而发生缺血性卒中的患者,预防复发性卒中的最佳抗栓治疗方案仍不明确。本研究旨在评估多种抗栓治疗对由≥2种病因引起的缺血性卒中后结局的影响。
来自一家医院的632例因AF和大动脉粥样硬化而发生缺血性卒中的患者的数据。根据出院时的抗栓治疗将患者分为3组:抗血小板治疗(APT)、口服抗凝药(OAC)以及APT联合OAC。研究结局包括复发性缺血性卒中和心血管事件、死亡及大出血的复合结局。采用倾向评分(PS)来平衡APT组和OAC组。
在632例患者中,158例(25.0%)接受APT治疗,447例(70.7%)接受OAC治疗,27例(4.3%)接受APT联合OAC治疗。应用PS后,仅OAC对复合结局有显著有益影响(风险比[HR]0.41[95%置信区间(CI)0.19 - 0.83];P = 0.01)以及对死亡有显著有益影响(HR 0.12[95%CI 0.01 - 1.0];P = 0.05)。然而,APT组和OAC组之间在1年复发性卒中事件或出血风险方面无显著差异。对OAC剂量与结局之间关系的进一步分析显示,OAC的减量与标准剂量之间无显著差异。
本研究表明,OAC单药治疗与AF和动脉粥样硬化性狭窄所致缺血性卒中后复合结局及死亡风险较低相关,尽管OAC剂量对临床结局无影响。